And all these new names will sound like or use words like silver, platinum, gold, hand crafted, darkroom, and traditional.
There are filters and programs that can turn your image into a painting but try selling your photograph as an oil painting or water colour. There must be new names coined.
And color is of course full spectrum polychromatic.
It's also amazing to me that people pay $20-$100+ for rice cookers, because the idea of dumping rice into hot water is too much for them to grasp. Photoshop has become the new rice cooker.
Fool. Rice cookers suck. You can't make real rice with a rice cooker.
Fool. Rice cookers suck. You can't make real rice with a rice cooker.
Fool. Rice cookers suck. You can't make real rice with a rice cooker.
Fool. Rice cookers suck. You can't make real rice with a rice cooker.
iandavid said:Fool. Rice cookers suck. You can't make real rice with a rice cooker.
Yes, a "simulated rice" outrage! Someone urgently needs to form an analog rice cooking group where we can vent our feelings on this one.
Ian
Yes, a "simulated rice" outrage! Someone urgently needs to form an analog rice cooking group where we can vent our feelings on this one.
I eat only digital rice.
But in a serious vein, can I make prints on rice paper?
There is no such thing as digital rice. How do I know? I can see the grain.
lxdude said:I eat only digital rice.
But in a serious vein, can I make prints on rice paper?
There is no such thing as digital rice. How do I know? I can see the grain.
I've only been doing photography (basically in any respect) for about a year but joined up to this website in order to explore film more (not just because i like the look but the philosophy, materials and such. And have been shooting film a little bit (still have yet to develop any on my own.. very soon though).
I've read some comments on here in the thread saying that university photography courses seem to teach digital over film. Is this universally true? Does anyone know of any university photography courses that do film justice? I'm looking to enroll myself and would love to learn film processes more.
Where can one find himself the materials and knowledge to know how to do some of these more obscure processes? Am I personally doomed to just try and learn myself?
I don't want to be a faker and I see digital and film as completely different tools (shooting in flight bugs would be impossible even with lasers on a film camera), but lets be honest how many places are there to even learn these processes anymore?
Hurry up and sign up for a course with Per Volquartz before he stops teaching soon.
You may have a problem signing up for a course taught by Ansel Adam though.
Steve
Don't worry about where you can be taught something, worry about where you can learn it. There are countless books in almost every university, or some sort of access to them through inter-library loans, that cover basically any photographic subject. You can learn anything from what a lens is, to the physics and geometry of lens refraction. Don't sit around waiting to rely on someone to teach you, take initiative and learn what you want to learn, as you want to learn it.
Usually anyone can access certain university libraries as long as they sign in at the front desk and present ID.
Joshua
That looks awesome thank you for the suggestion. A portfolio required though! Not sure i'd measure up with my limited (MF+35mm and some 4x5 instant) experience though.
Any other suggestions from others would be appreciated.
(please help convert me i'm already an alternative individual just convert me to an alternative film guy).
Does anyone think it's worth it then to go to university for photography? Especially pertaining learning film processes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?