what ISO/ASA for that kind of time?
what ISO/ASA for that kind of time?
Manuals for cameras like that actually reference the films that were available at the time the camera was new and current.
Films are very different now!
Those sorts of exposure settings are more a matter of historical curiosity now.
What does the manual tell about the shutter speeds and apertures you have available? With that information, and possibly some translation of the aperture, you can use a modern meter to actually measure the light and more reliably calculate exposure.
Is a light meter something I really need to take quality pictures?
Is a light meter something I really need to take quality pictures? Do you know if any guide to go by without a light meter?
Unless all films were of one speed in those days it just seems strange that there is no mention of film speed
Films were very different. Film "speeds" were very different
Depending on the version of the camera, it could be 110 years old!
Films were very different. Film "speeds" were very different - not even using the same system or measurements.
Film speed was 12 or 20, roughly. So divide the times given in the manual by about 16 and you'll get a more-or-less correct time for iso400. Err on the side of overexposure.
Matt, can I not presume that enough literature on 110 years old film remains such that whatever was in use then can be translated into the modern ISO equivalent?
Is it not possible to tell the rough age or age range of the camera from its description and from that move on to the speed range of typical films?
Will finding out all of this not be easier than relying on a meter? I'll answer that one myself. No, not a chance but I was simply trying to give an alternative approach to the OP who said:
"Is a light meter something I really need to take quality pictures? Do you know if any guide to go by without a light meter?"
I got the impression that the OP was sufficiently reluctant to consider moving to a meter to want to hear if there were any immediate alternatives.
pentaxuser
We don't know which camera the OP has - different versions were made between 1912 and 1935.
So we don't know which film was referenced in the manual.
What’s also not so clear is which shutter is on it. It could have a Kodak ball bearing shutter, which offers only T, B, 25, and 50. That shutter isn’t known for its accuracy. If the shutter is a B&L TBI, then it will be even more limiting.The Vest Pocket Autographic Kodak was a version advertised as "Soldier's camera" during WWI. It was manufactured from 1915 to 1926, sold 1,750,000 times. It was of the compact strut folding type and had the meniscus lens or a U.S.-speed 8 Rapid Rectilinear. Its camera back had an area through which notes could be written onto the paper backing of the 127 film, the "autographic" feature - invented by Henry J. Gaisman. Vest Pocket Autographic Special models were equipped with selected f/6.9 and f/7.7 lenses of Kodak, Bausch & Lomb, Zeiss, Ross, Berthiot or Cooke, the rarest is H Duplouich Verax although mainly with the Kodak Anastigmatf/7.7 lens and the Suter Basel Swiss made optics.
We don't know which camera the OP has - different versions were made between 1912 and 1935.
So we don't know which film was referenced in the manual.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |