Exposure and sharpness

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,203
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
Have you been able to control the effects of aperture on sharpness across the number of negatives you examined?

It seems to be a big factor. I often shut down to f45 or f64 when I was starting out with 4x5 -- photographing complex landscapes (middle of the redwood forests) requiring max DoF over any sharpness loss due to optical losses. When I moved out of the redwoods and could use the middle f/stops (f11 or f/16), enlarging these TMax100 negatives to 16x20, the prints were noticably sharper. Caltar IIN 150mm/5.6 lens
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,706
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format

Good point, and let's not forget that development also plays a significant role in sharpness. The best sharpness needs perfect exposure and development as well as a high-contrast subject, and all of that transferred to the print is not easy and most likely not necessary if it is an interesting and well-composed photograph, but still worth aiming for; getting it blurry is easy; getting it critically sharp not so much.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…