Exposing to recover details in highlghts

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital
It is mixed workflow forum.
I measure highlights, shadows and take it in the middle. Develop as usual. I prefer negatives to be more dense.
In the darkroom I mask shadows and burn highlights more. It works even with single grade papers. Some are using split printing on RC. As long as you aren't using something special, here is no big deal.
For scans negative has to be less dense.

And don't try too use film as surveillance technicue. If you can't see what is in the shadow, why film has to see it?
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,956
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Come to the southwestern US for a vacation and see a SBR of 12 to 14.
Never doubted for a minute that such a SBR exists in the southwestern U.S., Drew. It's just that we in homely little Britain have no experience of such wild extremes that are part and parcel of the likes of such extremes that arise in the U.S

Quite a land of extremes in many ways compared to Britain

pentaxuser
 
OP
OP

Luis Filipe

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2021
Messages
129
Location
London
Format
35mm

Thanks for the suggestion.

To be honest I even like shadows slightly deeper then they should apear. My question was more directed to understand better how exposing and developing works in order to get more range when printing as it might give more flexibility to work whole tones.

I normally expose for shadows where is there something relevant to me.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,956
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
So Luis from what we have given you, can you say what conclusions you have drawn and what you believe you can do to improve matters in terms of getting better negative exposure and subsequent prints?

Thanks

pentaxuser
 
OP
OP

Luis Filipe

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2021
Messages
129
Location
London
Format
35mm
So Luis from what we have given you, can you say what conclusions you have drawn and what you believe you can do to improve matters in terms of getting better negative exposure and subsequent prints?

Thanks

pentaxuser

Well, I think as everything it requires practice and understanding the mistakes.

As you said, while living in London I shouldn't face many issues regarding difference between shadows and highlights, but I think is important to understand how flexible the whole process can be in order to get the best print possible.

What I retained is that getting a good exposure is crucial, having a good understanding of zone system and knowing what your film can offer in terms of dynamic range. Also that I should takes steps thinking in the next one, like some limitations I could face while exposing could be fixed or corrected during the developing process with some different techniques. So all this must converge to facilitate the printing process and achieve your desired results and objective photograph.
There's also some tools you can apply during the printing that can extend this objective.
Basically all exposure, developing and printing play a game of reciprocity, they're all dependent a bit like aperture, shutter speed and ISO when exposing.

It all sounds somehow like shooting digital, camera raw and PS workflow but in a much more sensitive and intuitive process. There are no receipts but getting experience achieved from persistence and consistency.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,956
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Thanks Luis. Maybe just avoid the U.S. Southwest and that 14 stops range of SBR for a little while

pentaxuser
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,934
Format
8x10 Format
High contrast should also be anticipated where there's exceptionally clear air, like a trip to northern Scandinavia, or the Alps. Photographers from London, Paris, and Montreal always give me pushback on methodology because they seldom outrun the scale of the film, so don't fully appreciate the differences between films. But IN PRINCIPLE, better prints will be obtained by understanding such topics. Even though I have what I think are better ways of doing this than the Zone System, I still recommend learning it, both for what useful ideas it does provide, and as a kind of common-denominator vocabulary for forums like this one.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,364
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

I am not Drew, but I draw.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,364
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

I have more flexibility with traditional grain and T-grain film than C41 films. Some people do not have darkroom to develop film, so they do not have a choice.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,079
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
In scenes with the Subject Brightness Range [SBR] is fourteen f/stops, I can get that one film. Printing on paper takes some work.
About 13 stops SBR for this one. Might have been more...when the Pentax Digital Meter reads zero, there might be some darker areas. On the top end I got 13. Developed normally. I just happen to use a printing process that can grab all that info off the negative. But this is a rare extreme SBR. it would be very rare to find this range even under the redwoods wit hthe sun shining through.
 

Attachments

  • SeaCave5x7.jpg
    361.9 KB · Views: 93

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,364
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

This is a good example of what I meant by getting a large SBR. I like the composition and execution.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,079
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
Thanks. The photographer is always in their photographs...and sometimes their footprints. The lowest part of the cave opening was just under 4 foot tall. Even tho this is an old image (mid-90s), I still remember being careful not to fall when ducking under that low spot carrying the 5x7...footprints are one thing, but a print of my butt in the sand is another.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,546
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Expose to maintain shadow detail and process the film to allow the paper to render the highlights. This had not changed in 70 years.
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,934
Format
8x10 Format
Hasn't changed in 170 years. It's just gotten easier to do with the invention of light meters and better film emulsion quality control.
 

juan

Member
Joined
May 7, 2003
Messages
2,706
Location
St. Simons I
Format
Multi Format
Expose to maintain shadow detail and process the film to allow the paper to render the highlights. This had not changed in 70 years.
There’s the Minor White change in The New Zone System Manual of exposing for Zone V, choose developer for the shadows, and agitate for the highlights.
 

Alex Benjamin

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 8, 2018
Messages
2,464
Location
Montreal
Format
Multi Format


This would also be my approach to the problem. Once you've metered for the shadows and still found the highlights out of range, a filter could help with separation and contrast in the highlights (providing they don't interfere with shadow detail). If you're in B&W, add green, yellow or red to the list. It all depends, of course, on the situation and the color and nature of the details you want to bring out int the highlights.

Of course, in difficult situations like these, bracketing is essential.
 

Alex Benjamin

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 8, 2018
Messages
2,464
Location
Montreal
Format
Multi Format

Be aware that photographers from Montreal have cars and that a two-hour drive north basically lands us in northern Scandinavia.
 
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
1,685
Location
Atlanta, GA
Format
Medium Format
All of these questions are answered in Phil Davis' "Beyond the Zone System" which you can pick up used fairly reasonably, although the prices have gone up for some reason. I think I paid $7 for my copy. It's dense, but there is no more powerful system of exposure and development.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,956
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
I am not Drew, but I draw.
Sorry Sirius for not addressing my reply to you and sorry, Drew, for mistakenly addressing my reply to you

I recall a film called Southwest to Sonora which is just over the border from Cal. How about a new one called "Southwest to SBR14." It is a stagecoach type of film and you who rides shotgun are the one who says things like " better stay in the stage, ma'am with you camera, this is difficult SBR territory" as you carefully load up the old faithful of Xtol

pentaxuser
 

sterioma

Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2004
Messages
518
Location
United Kingdom
Format
Medium Format
Wait, what?

Never heard about that before. Could you or someone be more specific?

With roll film you are bound to develop all 12/24/36 frames in one go (e.g. 10 minutes at 1:1 develper ratio), so you don't have the luxury of tailoring the development time to individual frames according to their shooting conditions. Therefore, either your brightness range is the same on all exposures (e.g. you are in studio), or you have interchangeable backs that you can use for different development times, otherwise you are bound to give an "average" development time and then use paper grades to compensate.

Hope this helps.
 
OP
OP

Luis Filipe

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2021
Messages
129
Location
London
Format
35mm

Ahh ok. I was thinking in terms of metering.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…