Never doubted for a minute that such a SBR exists in the southwestern U.S., Drew. It's just that we in homely little Britain have no experience of such wild extremes that are part and parcel of the likes of such extremes that arise in the U.SCome to the southwestern US for a vacation and see a SBR of 12 to 14.
It is mixed workflow forum.
I measure highlights, shadows and take it in the middle. Develop as usual. I prefer negatives to be more dense.
In the darkroom I mask shadows and burn highlights more. It works even with single grade papers. Some are using split printing on RC. As long as you aren't using something special, here is no big deal.
For scans negative has to be less dense.
And don't try too use film as surveillance technicue. If you can't see what is in the shadow, why film has to see it?
So Luis from what we have given you, can you say what conclusions you have drawn and what you believe you can do to improve matters in terms of getting better negative exposure and subsequent prints?
Thanks
pentaxuser
Never doubted for a minute that such a SBR exists in the southwestern U.S., Drew. It's just that we in homely little Britain have no experience of such wild extremes that are part and parcel of the likes of such extremes that arise in the U.S
Quite a land of extremes in many ways compared to Britain
pentaxuser
You asked how to record the range--that's one option. If you dismiss tools out of hand you're limiting your options for success. I would say, however, that at this stage, C41 process is pretty conventional. Final prints can be on any B&W material you want to use. The negative is just a step towards the final image. If bland is what it takes, then consider bland. And, by the way, "bland" is pretty much what you will get in the negative if you develop to cover an extreme exposure range--you're just asking for bland and don't know it. The drama can come in the final print, and will require dodging and burning in.
Thanks Luis. Maybe just avoid the U.S. Southwest and that 14 stops range of SBR for a little while
pentaxuser
About 13 stops SBR for this one. Might have been more...when the Pentax Digital Meter reads zero, there might be some darker areas. On the top end I got 13. Developed normally. I just happen to use a printing process that can grab all that info off the negative. But this is a rare extreme SBR. it would be very rare to find this range even under the redwoods wit hthe sun shining through.In scenes with the Subject Brightness Range [SBR] is fourteen f/stops, I can get that one film. Printing on paper takes some work.
About 13 stops SBR for this one. Might have been more...when the Pentax Digital Meter reads zero, there might be some darker areas. On the top end I got 13. Developed normally. I just happen to use a printing process that can grab all that info off the negative.
There’s the Minor White change in The New Zone System Manual of exposing for Zone V, choose developer for the shadows, and agitate for the highlights.Expose to maintain shadow detail and process the film to allow the paper to render the highlights. This had not changed in 70 years.
For #1 metering with meter that can show you how many stops over or under are your shadows/highlights is the best. Manuals for most light meters have instructions on how to compensate when measuring white and black or other shades that are not equal to 18% gray. Maximum range will solely depend on your film/developer combo and developing times. It would need to be tested with some type of step wedge. Bracketing works well in most situations.
Zone system doesn't work very well with 35mm film. Development can only be changed for whole roll. Bulk loading short rolls could work when needed.
A little bit different approach is to use filters. Filters are very helpful with this. ND, gradual filters, Polarizer, even contrast filters can help to get exposure and contrast under control.
High contrast should also be anticipated where there's exceptionally clear air, like a trip to northern Scandinavia, or the Alps. Photographers from London, Paris, and Montreal always give me pushback on methodology because they seldom outrun the scale of the film, so don't fully appreciate the differences between films. But IN PRINCIPLE, better prints will be obtained by understanding such topics. Even though I have what I think are better ways of doing this than the Zone System, I still recommend learning it, both for what useful ideas it does provide, and as a kind of common-denominator vocabulary for forums like this one.
All of these questions are answered in Phil Davis' "Beyond the Zone System" which you can pick up used fairly reasonably, although the prices have gone up for some reason. I think I paid $7 for my copy. It's dense, but there is no more powerful system of exposure and development.I know this must have been discussed many times before but can't find any answer for what I need to know specifically.
So, let's say that in a scene I find important to reveal plenty detail in the shadows but there's also a considerable amount of highlights. I will have to develop the film to recover these highlights, so:
1) in order to obtain a full recover what is the maximum range in terms of stops between the darkest perceptible shadows and the lightest perceptible detail?
2) is there any math solution to calculate the amount of time to reduce or extend the developing time, e.g., if the difference mentioned in the previous question is 5 stops, is one stop certain percentage in time?
Sorry Sirius for not addressing my reply to you and sorry, Drew, for mistakenly addressing my reply to youI am not Drew, but I draw.
Zone system doesn't work very well with 35mm film
Wait, what?
Never heard about that before. Could you or someone be more specific?
With roll film you are bound to develop all 12/24/36 frames in one go (e.g. 10 minutes at 1:1 develper ratio), so you don't have the luxury of tailoring the development time to individual frames according to their shooting conditions. Therefore, either your brightness range is the same on all exposures (e.g. you are in studio), or you have interchangeable backs that you can use for different development times, otherwise you are bound to give an "average" development time and then use paper grades to compensate.
Hope this helps.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?