Expired HP5 + Do we need to adjust dev time?

about to extinct

D
about to extinct

  • 0
  • 0
  • 17
Fantasyland!

D
Fantasyland!

  • 9
  • 2
  • 94
perfect cirkel

D
perfect cirkel

  • 2
  • 1
  • 121
Thomas J Walls cafe.

A
Thomas J Walls cafe.

  • 4
  • 6
  • 277

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,745
Messages
2,780,271
Members
99,693
Latest member
lachanalia
Recent bookmarks
0

peter k.

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2011
Messages
1,404
Location
Sedona Az.
Format
Multi Format
Going to use up some old 4x5 HP5+ that's been in the freezer, it expired in 2013.
Have three developers available, D-76, Hc-110 and Xtol.
Suggestions on which would be the best to use, and is there a need to extend developing time.
Thanks p.
 

Pioneer

Member
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
3,878
Location
Elko, Nevada
Format
Multi Format
I am using 4x5 HP5+ that expired back in 2002. I expose it at EI-200 and develop it for that exposure index. I normally use D-23 1+3 that I mix fresh but I also use HC-110. Both developers work just fine for me and I suspect Xtol or D-76 would as well though I don't use either.

The only way to know how to expose or develop what you have is to test it but I doubt you will have a problem with the film to be honest.
 

eli griggs

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
3,846
Location
NC
Format
Multi Format
From several tests I've seen, comparing 'fresh' b&w films, vs. old, expired films, it seems that no only can you expose as if they were fresh, ie. your HP5 at 200 ISO, and that matching set of requirements for development at that ISO, should be fine, but, you can always shoot several test frames, clip and develop those, along side fresh film, both in the same tank, to see for yourself if that suits your taste.

The last test I saw doing this, but no the only one, the photographer found that the expired film seamed to have had 'seasoned' into an even better result.

However, if I were so concerned that my 'Master Piece' would somehow be on and ruined by having that old film in my camera, so much so, that I could no shoot it in any sort of peace of mind, I'd just wrap it up and send it to myself, Eli Griggs, for USPS charges, if any, so it was out of my reach and temptation, forcing me to buy and use only fresh, and leave the risk taking to myself, Eli Griggs, alone with any experimenting I was too cautious to do in the first place.

That's what I'd do, (HINT = HINT) on a slow Saturday Night.

Seriously, it should be fine.

IMO.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,291
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
The general rule is that, while old film may require extra exposure due to fogging (which increases the level of exposure needed to bring the image up out of the fog), it generally does not require extra development. You will need to adjust development time to regain normal contrast if you add benzotriazole to cut down on fog, of course, and if you cold develop (which, with BZT, can reduce fog level of even very badly age fogged films to nearly that of new stock) you'll obviously have to compensate for temperature.

The beauty of sheet film is that you can shoot a sheet or a couple sheets as tests, find the process that gives acceptable results, and then know where you are with the rest of the box. Of the developers you have, I'd recommend HC-110 (at least if it's pre-2018 vintage); in my experience with film exposed up to fifty years previous, it does a very good job controlling fog without adding restrainer.

Beyond that, however, 2013 isn't that old, especially if the film has been in the freezer; unless you live near Chernobyl or on tailings from a pitchblende mine, it's unlikely to have a level of fog that will be troublesome. As noted above, start by shooting one sheet at your normal speed for HP5 and give your normal development, then adjust from there. I've had good results from Tri-X that was twenty years past date, and from Fomapan nearly that old (recently shot .EDU Ultra film that expired around 2007 and stored at room temperature -- no special handling needed). With freezer storage, you're likely to find your HP5+ sheets don't need anything but normal handling.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,544
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I have some HP5 from around 1984. The base is around 0.6 to 0.7. I have an H&D curve on my disk somewhere I could post. Due the the fact that increase development time will make the base density worse, I'd probably process for your usual time or even less.
 

Agulliver

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
3,551
Location
Luton, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
What Ian said. I've shot 30+ year old HP5 with decent results. The caveat is....how was it stored? If kept in a freezer and thoroughly thawed before loading it is almost certainly going to be like new.

The old rule of thumb regarding a stop loss of sensitivity per decade usually refers to colour negative film stored in "cool" conditions.

Shoot a sheet or two and see what happens. Try 400ISO and Ilford's recommended time/regimen for your favourite developer.
 
OP
OP
peter k.

peter k.

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2011
Messages
1,404
Location
Sedona Az.
Format
Multi Format
Thanks all, ya all given me confidence that its no big deal ...
Two thumbs up for these responses: :D
However, if I were so concerned that my 'Master Piece' would somehow be on and ruined by having that old film in my camera, so much so, that I could no shoot it in any sort of peace of mind, I'd just wrap it up and send it to myself,

however, 2013 isn't that old, especially if the film has been in the freezer; unless you live near Chernobyl or on tailings from a pitchblende mine,
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom