• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Excessive grain in Delta 3200


I get much better quality from Delta 3200 when I print it. With that said, the quality of my scan above would have been higher if I had gotten the contrast right in the film to begin with.

I opine it is not all in the scan, but film exposure and processing is going to be equally important to the outcome. Once I have a print of the negative above I will scan it and post it to this thread.
 

I honestly don't see what's "bad" about the image anyway... Lol
 
I honestly don't see what's "bad" about the image anyway... Lol

Thanks, Stone. But I know it will get better once I print it. I hope to get some time to do just that this evening.
 
It's a very fast film and is inherently quite grainy. I shoot this film when I want both qualities (speed and grain). The character of the grain can
be quite lovely when the film is properly developed and printed. I've never scanned it, nor do I ever intend to, so cannot comment on that
particular variable.
 

It's a pain in the rear to scan... I admire your dedication to darkroom printing. It's how I prefer to work too, but life gets between the darkroom and I way too often. Takes me an hour to set up my darkroom and 30 minutes to clean up, and 30-45 minutes to get a decent print. Scanning a neg takes about 5 minutes with another 10-15 minutes in post production.
 
Microphen gives you wings

Microphen is as fine grained as D76 or not much different it was Ilfords best PQ derivative of ID11 it does have reduced sulphite but that was to optimise grain and speed.

So Id recommend to use Microphen as a standard developer indeed I do use...

I'd second that-shame it doesn't come in bigger packs though. If you use D3200 a lot, DDX is as good as anything.
 

I dont find D3200 to be hard to scan, what is it that's a pain?
 
I dont find D3200 to be hard to scan, what is it that's a pain?

I'm used to seeing the film printed, Stone. The grain is sharper when I print, but it is also not as ugly. When I scan I try to make it look like a print, because that's how I want it to look. But it takes a lot of effort to even get close.

Other films, like HP5+, where the grain is finer, it's much easier to scan and make it look decent in the small samples we see here, mainly because the grain is barely visible.