Even though Yoshihisa Maitani is deceased, I have an issue with him

In flight......

A
In flight......

  • 0
  • 0
  • 11
Ephemeral Legacy

A
Ephemeral Legacy

  • 1
  • 0
  • 33

Forum statistics

Threads
200,734
Messages
2,813,172
Members
100,358
Latest member
JetFalcon
Recent bookmarks
0
OP
OP
David Lyga

David Lyga

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
3,445
Location
Philadelphia
Format
35mm
Interesting to hear form the mouth of a verteran Olympus repair guy that tsome versions of the 50mm f/1.4 lens is one that defeated even Olympus repair guys and gave them fits while disassembling. It truly illustrates the classic complaint 'This was never designed to ever be repaired!" Sorry you own that lens, David.
I mean, I pride myself in being able to take apart even most zoom lenses. But this damn 1.4 Olympus is nothing but a repair disaster. What really makes me upset is how EASY in concept the repair is. Simply remove the retaining spanner ring and you can remove that element. But, NO, you cannot unscrew that ring, even though I can remove the ring on almost every lens I have attempted.

I am going to nurse my wounds by watching that aeroplane pass by Stearman Press for anther six hours. - David Lyga
 

crumbo

Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
42
Location
Texas
Format
35mm
Yeah, the 1.8 has five or six variants, but my parts books are stored upstairs and I'm too lazy to go up and check. For example, most of Olympus' original lenses had what was called "coated lens elements", cutting edge technology at the time, as good or better than any other glass made by anyone. When technology improved, Olympus elements were made with "multi-coating", then, "new multi-coating"! (Some later lenses (*cough* 85-250mm?) incorporated "ED" (Extra-low Dispersion) glass, but Olympus never touted it's use -- they didn't want customers to know that some lenses were "different" than others!)

While I'm sure other makers had similar processes, Olympus was exceptional for improving their equipment, not only during production, but by redesigning whole models when circumstances warranted. Every few years, whenever a design engineer thought up a simpler or more reliable way to do something, it would be incorporated, and we would get "new version" pages, or "improved parts" notations. "Because that's how Leica did it a long time ago," was never good enough for Maitani.

Olympus' problems were never on the "factory floor", you might say.

I trained on the SRT's and Spotmatics (among many other models) in my youth. All had their failings. Pentax used a "spill gear" design that is notorious for wearing out, making the shutter unreliable, and SRT's.... Well, I don't want to describe how simply putting a twist in a cord makes the indicators go crooked, and so forth. Like many designs, they were needlessly delicate, complex and "adjustable" when superior design could have made all that unnecessary. If someone has never encountered those kinds of problems in their camera, they should count themselves lucky!

Of course, every camera of the age used plastics, rubber and the like, and now plastics are failing, rubberized curtains are cracking, and so on. It happens to all of us!

Years ago at dinner a tech from Japan asked me, "Old cameras were never made to last 20, 30 years! Why you fix old cameras?! New cameras so much better! Get new ones!" I shrugged and said, "It's who we are -- we fix things!"
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom