EU SAYS INTERNET PICTURES BELONG TO YOU!!

Peter Schrager

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
4,205
Location
fairfield co
Format
Large Format
Just read this that the EU decided in favor of a photographer whose photo was taken and posted on a school website must get paid
Time to move to europe!
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
This is no news at all. The german legislation on this is 111 years old...

I guess the issue in this case arose on the term "publication". The user of the respective photo, a public school, seemingly argued that uploading on their school's website was no publication in the meaning of the law.

(Even here at Apug often the idea is uttered that non-commercial use of a protected photo is generally legal.)

As the school did not publish the photo directly, but as part of a student's work maybe this was argued on too.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
Messages
947
Location
L.A. - NYC - Rustbelt
Format
Multi Format
Just read this that the EU decided in favor of a photographer whose photo was taken and posted on a school website must get paid
Time to move to europe!

Yes, but from what I understand, in the EU you are not supposed to take photos of people in public and post on the net. If that is true, not good for street photogs.

If you need free images for your project, check with Wiki Commons, The Internet Archive, Europeana or Open Clip Art Library . They have millions and millions of free high res images. Pixabay is a truly outstanding site and has some really amazing photos…all for free.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Yes, but from what I understand, in the EU you are not supposed to take photos of people in public and post on the net. If that is true, not good for street photogs.

Street photography as typically understood is illegal in Germany since 111 years.

No outcry by photographers all those years...


(The moment a person no longer is part of a large group, or just kind of add-on to a scene, and few other restrictions publication of such photograph needed permission of such person since 1907. Very recent legislation even prohibits the mere taking of a person in distress. So much for Germany.)
 
Last edited:

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,480
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

If one needs photographs for a project, how about getting off of one butt and taking their own photographs. It is not rocket science.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,286
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
This isn't new, it's always been the case.

The issue is some photo sharing websites have hidden clauses in their user agreements implying anyone posting images gives up their rights. I know Facebook had to change their policies in this regard but I've no idea about other sites.

Ian
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I too am amazed that the case went that high, as to me it seemed a clear case.
Since the introduction of german author's right legislation it was clear that publication of a work does not mean that it is free to grab and re-publish.

I hope that really tricky cases now not all will end at EU High Court.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,480
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format


Even before I had a photo stolen from APUG, this was the reason that I would not use any of the "photo storage websites" which I considered "photo stealing websites".
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
"Fair Use" is an american legal concept too...

(Maybe the school/defendant in this case thought of such, though the court's comment does not hint at this. And we do not have such concept here either.)
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…