I am very unhappy with Canon lenses.
Why?
I am an old time Leitz user and I really hated the colors , contrast and everything of canon lens 35 80 ef a.
So, keep on using Leitz then!
My intention is to take real charming color palettes like Summitar glaze , Elmar metallic colors or Summicron skins.
That's only possible with Summitars, Elmars and Summicrons!
I think zeiss is good but not like Leica.
You're wrong!
I love Zeiss Sonnar and LOMO Cinema lenses.
Good for you!
I dont believe 35 mm Zeiss lenses are good as Hasselblad lenses.
Wrong again!
I am not sure the final output quality of cheaper Lomo kompakt . I did not see too much examples.
It's better to have a look, they look worse than those Canons you complaint about above!
I think carrying a bulk zeiss on my canon body is so funny also .
Funny maybe, wise certainly not!
Well which lens creates more exotic colors , new cheaper LOMO or 40 years old Sonnar ?
Define exotic!
It is the lens magic quality not the format.
Maybe, maybe not!
I dont want to go back to Leicas and I want to experiment.
So, stop comparing everything to Leitz products!
For me , best thing is Kiev 60 with a Square front anamorphic LOMO cinema lens , may be I do it with a cheaper LOMO zoom.
That's only for you, others may disagree!
What do you think ?
I think there's life after Leitz!