EOS + Hassy lens or Horizon

[Mustafa Umut Sarac]

I am thinking to buy a new camera , Horizon Perfekt or a Hasselblad lens and a mount to work with EOS 1000 analog.
Which is better ?

Mustafa Umut Sarac

 

[fschifano]

If you're considering a panoramic camera, then I don't understand why you'd be considering mounting a Hasselblad lens on a 35 mm camera. What are your intentions? A Hasselblad lens on a full frame 35 mm camera will not get you a wide angle of view, if indeed it is even possible to mount one to the camera.

 

[E76]

I'm wondering why you'd want to mount a medium format lens on a 35mm camera too. It will gain you nothing except a heavier camera with a large lens on the front. I'm not sure what you mean by "which is better" either. Care to clarify?

 

[JLP]

Buy the Horizon Perfect, fun camera and Hasselblad never made any lenses, Zeiss did.

 

[Mustafa Umut Sarac]

I am very unhappy with Canon lenses. I am an old time Leitz user and I really hated the colors , contrast and everything of canon lens 35 80 ef a.
My intention is to take real charming color palettes like Summitar glaze , Elmar metallic colors or Summicron skins.
I think zeiss is good but not like Leica.
I love Zeiss Sonnar and LOMO Cinema lenses.
I dont believe 35 mm Zeiss lenses are good as Hasselblad lenses.
I am not sure the final output quality of cheaper Lomo kompakt . I did not see too much examples.
I think carrying a bulk zeiss on my canon body is so funny also .
Well which lens creates more exotic colors , new cheaper LOMO or 40 years old Sonnar ?
It is the lens magic quality not the format.
I dont want to go back to Leicas and I want to experiment.
For me , best thing is Kiev 60 with a Square front anamorphic LOMO cinema lens , may be I do it with a cheaper LOMO zoom.
What do you think ?

 

[Markok765]

Jupiter 8 is great for color.

 

[Mustafa Umut Sarac]

Jupiter ... Litvinenko or something factory product , Moscow made , well i will check it from the galleries.
I found a site from LOMO presents Horizon pictures , some terrible some great but far from , very far from leica. Camera body is the most beatiful thing I have ever seen compared with colani designs. I looked to zenit cameras , they are perfectly designed. I think they know how to generate complex curves without fear and investing to many axis cnc mold making. I contacted with zenit factory at moscow and horizon 500 dollars cameras are 300 dollars there. I am still waiting the Kompakt price. I wished to be under 180.

 

[André E.C.]

I am very unhappy with Canon lenses.

Why?

I am an old time Leitz user and I really hated the colors , contrast and everything of canon lens 35 80 ef a.

So, keep on using Leitz then!

My intention is to take real charming color palettes like Summitar glaze , Elmar metallic colors or Summicron skins.

That's only possible with Summitars, Elmars and Summicrons!

I think zeiss is good but not like Leica.

You're wrong!

I love Zeiss Sonnar and LOMO Cinema lenses.

Good for you!

I dont believe 35 mm Zeiss lenses are good as Hasselblad lenses.

Wrong again!

I am not sure the final output quality of cheaper Lomo kompakt . I did not see too much examples.

It's better to have a look, they look worse than those Canons you complaint about above!

I think carrying a bulk zeiss on my canon body is so funny also .

Funny maybe, wise certainly not!

Well which lens creates more exotic colors , new cheaper LOMO or 40 years old Sonnar ?

Define exotic!

It is the lens magic quality not the format.

Maybe, maybe not!

I dont want to go back to Leicas and I want to experiment.

So, stop comparing everything to Leitz products!

For me , best thing is Kiev 60 with a Square front anamorphic LOMO cinema lens , may be I do it with a cheaper LOMO zoom.

That's only for you, others may disagree!

What do you think ?

I think there's life after Leitz!

Cheers and have fun!


André