AF performance across all EOS bodies is heavily influenced by response times at the lens side, ergo L-series lenses will have faster AF response times than the stock-level EF-series lenses. Battery type also has an influence e.g. a 2CR5 battery will drain faster with intensive AF use (especially with L-series lenses and the bigger telephotos), while a power drive booster or battery pack will provide stabled extended power (rechargeable packs especially).
The EOS 1N (not the early 1), 1V, and 3 all had a system level tweak that recognises an L-series lens and optimises AF performance for that lens.
Eye-controlled focus was a risky marketing lark from the start with the EOS 5 (I still have my long-decommissioned EOS 5), a bit better with the EOS 50E and 3 (vertical/horizontal and improved speed). Tthe most common irritation is that it constrained photographers to 'look' at a spot fixed by the camera instead of all around the viewfinder, in effect, having the camera "look" for the photographer (so do you get your LF camera to look at a fixed spot for you??). The "benefits" were largely imagined and philosophical. People with glasses, eye irregularities (even a very slight cataract would interfere with ECF calibration) and fiddly recalibratiion/profiling... I recall a Canon Australia service technician in 2008 saying, "it's gone, thank God for that!" in reference to ECF and photographers thinkingn their camera was malfunctioning and bringing it in for servicing (incurring a cost to themselves because they couldn't be bothered reading the instructions...).
Frame rates with any camera/power drive are highly dependent on the power source and lens response (as stated above).