Enlargers

Melvin J Bramley

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2021
Messages
545
Location
Canada
Format
35mm
In this age of exotic light sources from Ilfords computerised multigrade head to Zone VI, LED lights and others, are condenser light sources no longer a 'professional ' or serious darkroom users equipment?
Just how many of you still use a condenser head and why?
 

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,874
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
Contrast.

I like punchy images and a diffused head just doesn't give the same effect.

I also like glossy paper and cold paper developers for the same reason.
 

Pieter12

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2017
Messages
7,878
Location
Magrathean's computer
Format
Super8
Up until a few months ago I used a condenser Omega D5 with a Modern Enlarger Lamp LED. Before that the D5 had a halogen bulb, making slightly sharper prints than the original tungsten bulb.
 

131802

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2007
Messages
87
Format
35mm
I've never used anthing other than a condenser head enlarger.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,664
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
When all the electronic enlargers have failed, the condenser enlargers will still be working.
However, the condensers need to be treated with care. If they break or get fungus or scratched, then they are no good.
 

albada

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
2,175
Location
Escondido, C
Format
35mm RF
When all bulbs in condenser enlargers have burned out, LED enlargers will still be working.
Advantages of LEDs:
  • No inserting/removing contrast filters. Instead, turn a knob labeled "grade".
  • No heat-warp of negative.
  • No burned-out bulbs (that are hard to replace).
  • You can turn on red to position burn/dodge tool before exposing.
  • You can set both exposure and grade from one test strip, saving time.
I ditched both condensers and Micro$oft, and never looked back.
"Put your hands on a LED-head, and you'll never let go."

Mark
 

Hilo

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
922
Format
35mm
I have used the Leitz enlargers professionally since 1978, in their original set-up with the condensor heads. And I still do.

Why?

Because the prints are fabulous. They have a beautiful strong contrast while giving fine detail in the darker parts. The grain, when printed with the correct filters, is very beautiful. Lets say the opposite of looking harsch. Generally, I arrive at the right exposure and the correct filter with one, perhaps two tests.

The thought to change that never entered into the equasion. I guess, I am someone who simply is not interested in changing a good thing.

Finally, these enlargers were beautifully designed. Round heads, incredible condensers. To lose all that in exchange for an out-of-place looking square head: no.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
25,276
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Melvin J Bramley said:
Just how many of you still use a condenser head and why?
Click to expand...

Well, I'm using a diffusor-condensor setup with a LED head, does that count? No, it's not 'professional' in any way. It's a hobby project that sort of got out of hand and turned into a functional machine, and somewhere in the process I ditched my other enlargers because I didn't see the point in growing a forest of enlarger columns. I can only use one at a time anyway.

But what gives? An enlarger is basically a fancy slide projector. It shines a light through a negative and a lens to project an image onto a piece of paper. As long as it does that reasonably well, consistently and is easy enough to use, it's fine. I see no reason to fuss over the question if it's 'professional', fashionable, etc. In the end, if it gets the job done, I don't really care one way or another how it does it. Now I'm happy with the Durst 138 with its Frankenstein light source, but if life changes drastically and somehow I find myself 10 years down the line with only a simple 35mm camera and an old and rusty Meopta enlarger I saved from the scrapheap, I wouldn't lose any sleep over it either.
 

Philippe-Georges

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
2,680
Location
Flanders Fields
Format
Medium Format
Condenser (Omega D3 and Durst 139G), with an incandescence bulb.
Fort the 'spicy grain', feeling of sharpness, intense base (=blacks), clear whites, 'punchy' image tonality and more efficient dodging and burning.
I have the feeling that with a diffuser head D&B isn't so 'visual', but that could be just me...
 

xkaes

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 25, 2006
Messages
4,966
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
Edward Weston preferred a point light source -- which is a standard condenser, taken to the MAX. You ONLY use the lens WIDE OPEN!

Just because something is new doesn't mean it's better.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,947
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I use condenser head with a standard LED bulb, if I need to print grade 4 I switch back to a tungsten blub.
 

Philippe-Georges

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
2,680
Location
Flanders Fields
Format
Medium Format
xkaes said:
Edward Weston preferred a point light source -- which is a standard condenser, taken to the MAX. You ONLY use the lens WIDE OPEN!

Just because something is new doesn't mean it's better.
Click to expand...

I thought that E.W. only made contact prints, A.A. wrote something like that in his book 'EXAMPLES'...
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,947
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I had never read that EW used a point source, AA did with at least some of his 35mm negatives, in his last edition of the Print he mentions a point source head for his Bessler 4X5. I tired a point source, made one from an old Federal enlarger, use a small halogen lamp, way too sharp, and the grain.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,623
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I use a color diffuser head for color and Black & white enlargements. Bulbs are still available for my but I stocked up because incandescent bulbs are outlawed in California except for special use bulbs, such as enlarger bulbs, and that might making it hard to get bulbs in the future.
 

Philippe-Georges

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
2,680
Location
Flanders Fields
Format
Medium Format

What's a "Frankenstein light source"?
 

Patrick Robert James

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
3,386
Format
35mm RF
After all the enlargers and light types I've used in my life, my favorite is a diffuse light source through a condenser. That is basically what most condensers are. My Focomat 1c is that way. So is my LPL 4550 with a 35mm mixing box in it. The 4x5 box is straight diffusion. I've said before that the LPL 4550 with the 35mm mixing box is the best 35mm enlarger I've ever used. Better by a little than my Focomat, though the Focomat is easy peasy to use so I usually just use that.

I also have a Minox enlarger which is a point light source. Incredibly sharp but a bit of grief. These days I usually just use the LPL to enlarge Minox. Not quite as sharp but once you get past more than good enough, everything is more than good enough. I've always wanted to get a Durst with the point light source head, but I think it might just be too much grief in the end. The prints would be super sharp but unforgiving.

There is no such thing as a professional enlarger. There are professional users I suppose, but I've seen some incredible prints come off the worst enlargers. The operator is the only thing that really matters past a most basic certain point.
 

xkaes

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 25, 2006
Messages
4,966
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
Patrick Robert James said:
After all the enlargers and light types I've used in my life, my favorite is a diffuse light source through a condenser. That is basically what most condensers are.
Click to expand...

My Beseler 45MXII has different colorheads, but Beseler also made a lesser-known, optional accessory that attaches the colorhead on top of the standard B&W condenser -- which is normally removed when the colorhead is installed. The only thing Beseler says about it is "for a different look". I have one and like it for exactly that reason.
 

Patrick Robert James

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
3,386
Format
35mm RF
xkaes said:
Edward Weston preferred a point light source -- which is a standard condenser, taken to the MAX. You ONLY use the lens WIDE OPEN!

Just because something is new doesn't mean it's better.
Click to expand...

Technically it wasn't a point source light since he used frosted bulbs and typically wrapped them with tissue paper.....

I believe his son Brett though used a point source enlarger after he moved down to medium format.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
54,305
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Patrick Robert James said:
There is no such thing as a professional enlarger. There are professional users I suppose, but I've seen some incredible prints come off the worst enlargers. The operator is the only thing that really matters past a most basic certain point.
Click to expand...

There certainly are enlargers designed for professional/commercial use - robust machines designed for very heavy use and high throughput.
The Durst line of machines come to mind - not the ones designed for the home user, but the ones like the model that friends of mine own that cost $38,000.00 when purchased new (by a commercial user) back in the 1970s. Working with that enlarger is really impressive, but mostly it just does things really well that other enlargers also do. It is a 5x7 enlarger, so that certainly adds capabilities that smaller enlargers don't have.
With enough room, I'd be very happy to set up a two enlarger bench - one with a condenser and a diffused bulb, the other with a diffusion source. That would give me two useful approaches, although the diffusion source would get used more.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,623
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
While I do not have a condenser, a condenser would be good to have for higher sharper black & white prints.
 

Pieter12

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2017
Messages
7,878
Location
Magrathean's computer
Format
Super8
As I posted earlier, I used a condenser D5 up until recently. I switched to a Heiland LED head that removes the condensers but gives me the same sharp, crisp prints I had been getting from the condenser set-up with the advantage of being able to do split-grade printing over the full range without having to switch filters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…