Hutchings later said he thought the alkaline after bath only added base (ie non-imagewise) stain and no longer advised doing it.
While I don’t know of a mechanism by which this would work, I have not seen objective evidence for or against. There is/was such a thing as latent tanning, but not related to dye formation.
The original suggestion was to keep the used developer and place the fixed partially washed negative back in it, this definitely just increased base stain and probably had detrimental affects ast the additionalstaining could be uneven.
I can't speak for PMK and Pyrofallol stain as I've never wanted to use it but with Pyrocat HD once the stain is created during development it is very stable, it is not affected by Stop bath or choice of using an Acid fixer. I use an Ilford paper tone IT=8, essentially a Bichromate re-halogenating bleach (which is also an Intensifier), this uses a simple Pyrocatechin/Carbonate re0developer which has a bery short tray life, the effects are Olive brown prints quite different to sepia toners. As I have Pyrocat HD on the shelf I've used it as the re-developer and the results are the same.
Using old test strips and scrap prints I've tried various chemicals and can't reduce the staining once created, also I tried testing the effects of sop baths and fixers andthey made no difference.
Can someone explain to me how a stronger dilution of Pyrocat HD is going to produce more stain if the film is developed to the same contrast as with 1:100 dilution? Is there a variant of Pyrocat that skews stain density significantly over silver density while producing negatives of the same contrast as 1:100?
Generally higher concentrations are used to increase contrast and the Dmax for alternative processes, however there's also som esubtle differences which are hared to describe.
If we take a simpler high dilution developer like Rodinal then the best way of controlling contrast is dilution rather than time a negative processed to the same Dmax at 1:25 has more contrast than one processed at 1:50, it's similar when printing as well. It's the effects of diffusion and localised exhaustion. In addition grain size incres with higher concentration and that also affects staining.
Ian