efke 820c and IR filter

Tyndall Bruce

A
Tyndall Bruce

  • 0
  • 0
  • 15
TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 4
  • 0
  • 42
Small Craft Club

A
Small Craft Club

  • 2
  • 0
  • 43
RED FILTER

A
RED FILTER

  • 1
  • 0
  • 34
The Small Craft Club

A
The Small Craft Club

  • 3
  • 0
  • 38

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,900
Messages
2,782,734
Members
99,741
Latest member
likes_life
Recent bookmarks
0

coigach

Member
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
1,593
Location
Scotland
Format
Multi Format
Hello,

I plan on using Efke 820c with my Pentax 67II in-camera meter and a Heliopan RG695 (equivalent to wratten 89b or Hoya 72) filter. Will use this setup with tripod for landscape shots in bright sun. I think the filter should allow enough light through to allow me to meter in-camera in bright sun.

The Pentax 67 lenses have an IR mark on them. Should I focus using these to take account of IR wavelength or should I use my 'standard' hyperfocal focussing for the aperture I'm using? Am not sure what wavelength the Pentax IR lens markings measure. Help! :confused:

Cheers,
Gavin
 

Travis Nunn

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2005
Messages
1,601
Location
Midlothian, VA
Format
Medium Format
This shot was taken with Efke IR and a 89b filter on my RB67... (there was a url link here which no longer exists)

I metered through the lens and did not adjust focus.
 

ntenny

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,481
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format
I've shot quite a bit of Efke 820c through the equivalent filter and never adjusted the focus. I think it's more of an issue with the far-IR frequencies to which HIE is sensitive.

The one exception was the roll I shot through a Rolleinar, which resulted in some of the worst photos ever. The problem may have been that the focus adjustment became critical at macro distances (but it could have been other things too).

You could shoot a test roll with the same exposures twice, once with normal focus and once adjusted to the mark, and see what you get.

-NT
 

Toffle

Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
1,930
Location
Point Pelee,
Format
Multi Format
The one exception was the roll I shot through a Rolleinar, which resulted in some of the worst photos ever. The problem may have been that the focus adjustment became critical at macro distances (but it could have been other things too).

You could shoot a test roll with the same exposures twice, once with normal focus and once adjusted to the mark, and see what you get.

-NT

I've just been experimenting with this over the past week. I took a few shots on a roll of SFX using a Rolleinar 2. While the rest of the roll is accurately in focus, the close-ups are definitely outside of the DOF/COF. As was suggested to me, a simple but fairly accurate test would be to take a shot at a known distance, with a ruler in the frame. By comparing the portion of the ruler that is in focus with the subject that was supposed to be in focus, you should have a pretty good idea how to adjust the focus for future work.

Cheers,
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Gary Holliday

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
824
Location
Belfast, UK
Format
Medium Format
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom