Edge marks on 120 b/w negative

Sydney Harbour

A
Sydney Harbour

  • 5
  • 1
  • 76
Sonatas XII-90 (Farms)

A
Sonatas XII-90 (Farms)

  • 0
  • 2
  • 67
Barn and Silo

H
Barn and Silo

  • 3
  • 0
  • 74
Awaiting light

D
Awaiting light

  • 3
  • 0
  • 69
Dusk in the Rockies

A
Dusk in the Rockies

  • 4
  • 0
  • 136

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
200,362
Messages
2,806,822
Members
100,225
Latest member
mvtestaccount
Recent bookmarks
0

bernard_L

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
2,083
Format
Multi Format
After developing a 400TX 120-size film (D-76 1+1, 10min@20°C), I had a quick look using a method that shall remain name-less. On 3 or 4 of the 15 frames, and only these, I see spurious marks near the edge. Generally the neighbor frames are free from such marks. Based on that evidence, I would rule out surge marks. And suspect mechanical stress at/around the friction loading mechanism of the Paterson reel. I can't remember whether loading was problematic. Whole frame and contrast-enhanced detail are attached.
  • Do you agree on the probable cause?
  • Other possible causes?
Yes, I know, Hewes stainless steel reels rule. I need a diagnostic before evaluating remedies.
2018-m02-11-S.jpg 2018-m02-11-S-cr.jpg
 

jimjm

Subscriber
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
1,237
Location
San Diego CA
Format
Multi Format
Bernard - are you sure your reels were completely dry? If this occurred along the edges of the frame where the film touches the reels, and there was any water on the reels, it could account for the inconsistent splotchy marks you see here. If the film sat for a bit before you poured in the first chemicals, this water could soak into the film along the edge and affect the development density in those areas. I'm sure there are other possible causes, but this is the first that comes to mind. I've been using Patersons for 30+ years and never needed to switch to steel reels. Just a personal preference. It is important to keep them clean and dry before attempting to load film.
 
OP
OP
bernard_L

bernard_L

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
2,083
Format
Multi Format
My OP is missing something that should be present in any question about problematic negatives: a picture of the negative itself. The edge marks are barely visible. One can also make out a faint reflection of another verboten device used to bring you this picture. The main point here is that the rebate is clear. Which does not rule out mechanical stress, which may act different from added light exposure.
DSCF2337.JPG
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
54,068
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
This looks like the sort of uneven development occurring near bubbles that can sometimes happen when there is either too little developer in the tank or a residue on the reels that alters development locally.
 
OP
OP
bernard_L

bernard_L

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
2,083
Format
Multi Format
Bernard - are you sure your reels were completely dry?
Yes, I'm sure. I developed a few films over roughly one week, but never used one of the reels that I had left to dry a few days before; each time a reel that had been unused for weeks. And, after reading (a year ago??) about the supposedly ill effects of photo-flo I gave my reels one turn in the dishasher, and since then wash them with hot water from the faucet.

Anyway, this addresses tentative answers to the question: "why did the film not load perfectly smoothly" (which I am not even sure actually occurred).
My question is: assuming the loading was a little difficult, is it plausible that mechanical stress at/around the autoload mechanism (spring-loaded steel ball, or whatever) could cause the observed marks.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
This looks like the sort of uneven development occurring near bubbles that can sometimes happen when there is either too little developer in the tank or a residue on the reels that alters development locally.
+1.
 
OP
OP
bernard_L

bernard_L

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
2,083
Format
Multi Format
I'll buy the bubbles explanation. Possibly, after many problem-free developments, I became complacent and skipped the "bottom-tap" after pouring the developer.

Thanks to jimjm, MattKing, and Mainecoonmaniac for your comments.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
15,328
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
If it was stress "whitening " of the base film plastic, you should see it in the margins. I used Paterson reels since mid 70's. Every now and then they balk. Some of these reels are 40 years old. I found some with rusty steel balls etc. I bought a bunch of new reels from a store closing. New reels are a treat.
 

Ben 4

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
270
Location
Lancaster, P
Format
Medium Format
Yes — bubbles: I have experienced this too. I now use at least 550ml of developer for 120 in my Paterson tanks (10% more than Paterson specifies).

--Ben
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom