mshchem
Subscriber
Oh my now the Cropping discussion 

Oh my now the Cropping discussion![]()
Except for 5x7 and 8x10 publicity stills I have always used a 4 blade easel and printed each picture to it's own proportions. I started with the 14x17 Saunders. They can call it anything they want, it's a great easel! I've used it to print books with fiber prints dry mounted back to back, each picture a different size. I have a 16x20 now which I modified to take 20x24 paper.
I never liked cutting mats so I print on larger paper with as much border as the photo needs. If I want to get fancy a thin black border can be added with a piece of cardboard in 2 exposures while the paper is in the easel.
And those of us with less than zero carpentry skills?
I pretty much crop everything I print, cannot remember the last time I used the whole negative regardless of the format.
A box of Ilford Warmtone FB (50 sheets). 16x20" = $319 while a box of 20x24" is $519..... not too long & you've paid for a large easel. Even at the current cost of mat board, i won't print a 16x20" on a sheet of 20x24" .....that's a 25% waste of paper.
Anyone with reasonable carpentry skills can put together a simple frame easel for printing 20x24"... that's what I had before I got my big Saunders/
Actually 33.3% is whitespace and if you utilize 25 finished prints that's $6 difference each. Would you supply the mat board and cut it for $6?
My LPL easel showed up, in near new condition. Seems to use the same method as the Saunders for doing 14x17, lift the blades and blade frame from in inner frame that is used for 14x17. Pleased with it.
View attachment 324411 View attachment 324412 View attachment 324413
Perhaps not, but if I'm matting a finished print I want it to look 'finished' .....& with a bevelled over mat is the style i've adopted. If you like the centred photo on photo paper that's cool..... but i far prefer working w 16x20" paper almost to the edge than the bigger trays, greater volume of chemicals of 20x24. That's one of the reasons when i sell prints.. 20x24 are priced substantially higher than 16x20"
Still, I'm not sure how we got to this & cropping after what seemed like a quite straightforward question about easels.....
Thread Drift.
I'm actually going to disagree (a bit) about the reference to Thread Drift.
The paper and handling and presentation preferences you have are critically important to the question of what you need or want in an easel.
I took the OP's question to be, generally speaking, why are commonly available easels the size that they are?
And the thread "drifts" are part of the answer to that.
When money was scarce, I could cut window mats quickly and easily with jigs to lay out the window, a Dexter mat cutter, and a T-square. Eventually I standardized on one precut format for anything intended for a 16x20 frame. Galleries may frown on this approach, but artists sometimes have to be more practical.
When money was scarce, I could cut window mats quickly and easily with jigs to lay out the window, a Dexter mat cutter, and a T-square. Eventually I standardized on one precut format for anything intended for a 16x20 frame. Galleries may frown on this approach, but artists sometimes have to be more practical.
This seems like a great subject for its own thread. Perhaps in the Presentation and Marketing sub-forum?Maybe I shouldn't try to hijack the thread, but I'd like to know a little more about these jigs for a Dexter cutter. Were you simply using them to draw the hole? Or was it something more substantial?
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |