E-76, as good as D-76?

Kildare

A
Kildare

  • 0
  • 0
  • 194
Sonatas XII-27 (Homes)

A
Sonatas XII-27 (Homes)

  • 0
  • 1
  • 245
From the Garden

D
From the Garden

  • 1
  • 0
  • 877
Kildare

A
Kildare

  • 8
  • 2
  • 1K
Sonatas XII-26 (Homes)

A
Sonatas XII-26 (Homes)

  • 3
  • 2
  • 1K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,312
Messages
2,789,498
Members
99,867
Latest member
jayhorton
Recent bookmarks
1

Mani_Reshad

Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2024
Messages
32
Location
Iran
Format
Multi Format
I‘m considering mixing up some E-76 since it costs a lot less than D-76(somewhat a bit more than half of it) and is environmentally friendly but I was wondering how it would do compared to d-76. I guess the grain, sharpness and contrast are identical and my main concern is the stability of it. And FYI I‘m using Anchell-Patton‘s formula in the 4th edition of the darkroom cookbook:

Water at 52C, 750ml
Phenidone, 0.2g
Sodium Sulfite, 100g
Ascorbic Acid, 8g
Borax, 10g
Cold water to make a litre.
 

Loose Gravel

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2003
Messages
964
Location
Santa Barbar
No carcinogens. That's nice. Probably much like XTOL or Eco Pro Ascorbic developers. Grain could be slightly better and highlights won't be automatically bulletproof since there is no HQ. I'm biased because I hate HQ developers. YMMV
 

albada

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
2,175
Location
Escondido, C
Format
35mm RF
As @Loose Gravel said, image quality will probably be slightly better than D-76. However, the Fenton reaction might destroy the ascorbic acid in a few weeks or months, depending on the iron- and copper-content of your water and chemicals. Adding DTPA will prevent that problem, but DTPA is usually difficult to obtain. I recommend (1) mix the developer without the ascorbic acid in it, (2) add the ascorbic acid soon before developing film, and (3) use the developer one-shot, discarding it after one use.

Mark
 

titrisol

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
2,071
Location
UIO/ RDU / RTM/ POZ / GRU
Format
Multi Format
As @Loose Gravel said, image quality will probably be slightly better than D-76. However, the Fenton reaction might destroy the ascorbic acid in a few weeks or months, depending on the iron- and copper-content of your water and chemicals. Adding DTPA will prevent that problem, but DTPA is usually difficult to obtain. I recommend (1) mix the developer without the ascorbic acid in it, (2) add the ascorbic acid soon before developing film, and (3) use the developer one-shot, discarding it after one use.

Mark

Or mix the concentrate with distilled or deionized (DI) water and then use as 1 shot
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
23,599
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Or mix the concentrate with distilled or deionized (DI) water and then use as 1 shot

No need for the distilled/deionized/demineralized water if the developer is used shortly after mixing.
Conversely, distilled/etc water won't protect against iron impurities that hitch a ride into the developer by other means - i.e. as trace contaminants in other ingredients, or on utensils used.
 

Lachlan Young

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
4,961
Location
Glasgow
Format
Multi Format
"Environmentally friendly" is an extremely big stretch, considering it contains Borax.
 

mrosenlof

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
621
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
I mix E-76 one-shot right before use. Phenidone is in a solution 1g in 100ml of denatured alcohol, and I keep the Sulfite and Borax as a pre-mixed solution. I tend to add about 1ml of a 1g in 100ml alcohol benzotriazole per roll also.

I don't own a densitometer, so can't give a good measurement if it's as good as D-76, but I think "It's Fine". I use the film data sheet recommendations for D-76.

I guess I haven't answered the OP's question about stability because I don't mix and then store a stock solution.
 

halfaman

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
1,419
Location
Bilbao
Format
Multi Format
The E.U. have restrictions on the use of borates. They're not banned but the quantities that can be used in products are limited.
Adox D76 is borate-free unlike Kodak D76 and Ilford ID11.

The actual EU legislation considers some boron compounds like boric acid and borax toxic for reproduction. Any product marketed with 0.3% or more of these boron compounds is labelled as toxic which triggers automatically transport restrictions.

Hydroquinone stays in the Adox D76 formulation which is also a toxic substance and more serious than borates.
 

Philippe-Georges

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
2,680
Location
Flanders Fields
Format
Medium Format
I used E-76 (1+1) a lot in the past, liked it a lot, but all the sudden it would not work anymore, although I always mixed it fresh in demineralised water just before use.
Fenton effect, perhaps, if so why all the sudden after years of trouble free use?

I still use E-72, which is a home brewed Phenidone — Vit-C developer for FB paper, trouble free for about the same span of years (since 2006).

ADOX XT-3 (1+1) is now in what I develop film 😀...
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2016
Messages
1,274
Location
Calexico, CA
Format
Multi Format
Since I saw this post, and since I had the required ingredients for E-76 (used on other developers I mix) I tried this last week.

I was really pleased with the results :smile: I tested with Aviphot 200 at @200 and really liked the results. Others developers I've mixed didnt get me to 200 without showing fog, but with E-76 fog was minimal. Looking for trying it with some aviphot 200 4x5 and see results.


Tomorrow I will test with some Delta 400 and HP5+ that I have pending to process (not critical stuff) to see what happen.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom