Durst M605: can't focus 50mm Rogonar lens with bigger magnification -

BobUK

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2021
Messages
514
Location
England, UK
Format
Medium Format
Wind the enlarger head up to maximum height.

Close the bellows up to their shortest.

Pop a negative in the carrier.

Remove the mounting flange completely from the lens.

Switch on the enlarger light.

Open the aperture to maximum.

Now carefully, by hand, hold the lens in the light path moving it up and down inside the bellows to see if you can get it to focus.

A bit fiddly, but it can be carried out enough to see a flash of focussed negative on the base board.




That should prove the problem to either the lens itself or the lens to negative distance problem.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,263
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
koraks said:
It's really an unfortunate combination of lens board, lens and desired magnification, nothing else.
Click to expand...

And maybe deliberate design by Rodenstock, who wanted you to upgrade for larger prints. By the time the lens was made and marketed Durst were by far the largest enlarger manufacturer in Europe, followed by Meopta.

Ian
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
22,786
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
@Ian Grant as I was cooking dinner, the same thing occurred to me. It's possible Rodenstock really did deliberately limit its use.

@BobUK that's a good test and worth a try. I'm confident it will prove the lens as such focuses just fine; it's just a matter of finding a way to mount it high enough into the enlarger.
 
OP
OP

BeselerOrNot

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2023
Messages
48
Location
Prague, Czech Republic
Format
35mm
BobUK said:
Now carefully, by hand, hold the lens in the light path moving it up and down inside the bellows to see if you can get it to focus.
Click to expand...
Surely that was the first thing I did, and I see a focused image. But that still leaves the possibility that I assembled smth wrong, or some part is missing.
Looks like no, however.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,544
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Those of you that own the same enlarger, can you confirm the bellows is fully collapsed in the picture from the first post.

I have two enlargers that look similar (Minolta and Philips) in which the bellows collapses until the lensboard physically touches the negative stage.
 

BobUK

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2021
Messages
514
Location
England, UK
Format
Medium Format

I have just tried my M605 with the Durst 50mm lens.
Set at 8x magnification it projects an in focus image of 28 cm x 18 cm. Roughly two centimetres smaller on each dimension than A4 paper size. I think you mentioned A4 paper size as your maximum.

Looking at the Rodenstock website for enlarging lenses, see the link above, scroll down and read the full specification.
It looks like 8x is the maximum enlargement.
Have a good read and see if you think the same as me.

It,s a new one on me if that is the case.
 

BobUK

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2021
Messages
514
Location
England, UK
Format
Medium Format
I, it looks fully compressed to me, but have a read of my previous post just now.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,945
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm

It just seem strange that Durst fails to warn its user that the SIRIOTUB recessed lens holder does not work with the Rogonar that the OP has got.
At least in my manual which Durst calls the Operating Manual I can see nothing there, as I said before, that gives any warning that some lenses such as the Rogonar -S will not work with the standard SirioTub recessed holder

pentaxuser
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,945
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Melvin J Bramley said:
Cheaper enlarging lenses are likely optimised for 8 x 10 prints.
Click to expand...
But optimised in what way? I can appreciate that print quality in cheaper lenses may suffer more beyond a certain magnification but that's quite different from not focusing beyond 8x10, surely? It's this lack of ability to focus up to A4 that is the sole issue here - at least from my understanding of the OP's problem

pentaxuser
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,945
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
BeselerOrNot said:
Rogonar-S probably will. This is "just" Rogonar, and from the Rodenstock's paper they have a very different design.
Click to expand...

Sorry I got the name wrong but the essence of my post still stands doesn't i.e. I find it strange that Durst does not mention this lens as being unsuitable for any magnification beyond what I assume to be 8x10 on the basis that magnification to A4 is impossible

However if you are convinced that this is the case than that's fine. Best of luck with finding a suitable lens

pentaxuser
 

Mark J

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2023
Messages
438
Location
Denbigh, North Wales UK
Format
Multi Format
BobUK said:
Looking at the Rodenstock website for enlarging lenses, see the link above, scroll down and read the full specification.
It looks like 8x is the maximum enlargement.
Click to expand...

I think Rodenstock there will be quoting an optical (optimum range) specification for the lens, they wouldn't quote a limit connected to any specific enlarger. That's the normal convention.
 
OP
OP

BeselerOrNot

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2023
Messages
48
Location
Prague, Czech Republic
Format
35mm
koraks said:
it's just a matter of finding a way to mount it high enough into the enlarger.
Click to expand...

Yeah.. I even tried to reverse the lens, mounting it from inside the bellows. This kinda worked, in terms of focus, but the aberrations were wild -- distortion, field curvature and overal lack of any sharpness outside the center. Not to mention the unaccessible aperture ring
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,905
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

Most likely this is the sort of solution you need for that model of lens.

BeselerOrNot said:
The lens could be just newer than the enlarger itself
Click to expand...


Correct. Or the lens may be a model that was not readily available in the markets where the M605 and that version of the Siriotub were common.
Durst availability varied widely around the world - at least with respect to the amateur market. For example, they were widely available in Canada, but relatively hard to find in the USA.

I repeat my earlier observation - not all 50mm lenses work with all mounting systems for all enlargers.
 

Mark J

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2023
Messages
438
Location
Denbigh, North Wales UK
Format
Multi Format
In the 80's/90's era (at least), the Rogonar was a triplet, the Rogonar-S was a Tessar ( 4-element ) and the Rodagons are 6-element.
Tessars are OK at f/2.8 with high-index glass. However, there was a Roganor triplet at f/3.5 and one at f/2.8.
They would need high-index glass for that aperture, and the performance graphs of the f/2.8 version show that it is still a 'stretch' for a triplet

Really, these days with the 2nd-hand market, there are so many great 6-element lenses available from Schneider, Rodenstock, Nikon and Durst, that if you can afford an extra £20, then just do it.
 

Melvin J Bramley

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2021
Messages
505
Location
Canada
Format
35mm

I'm no optics expert!
perhaps the cheaper 50mm lenses are optimised for lower magnifications.
I have two 'wide angle" enlarging lenses.
A 40mm Nikon for 35mm negs and a 60mm Tominon for 6x6 negs!
With that in mind the Nikon 80mm, not the usual 90mm suggested, is said to cover 6 x 7.
It is confusing but i think the original poster has either an assembly issue with his m605 or should just purchase a better lens that is readily available inexpensively.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…