• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Done With X-Tol

D-76 is not an everlasting developer either.

Are all ascorbic acid based developers when mixed with water undergoes rapid oxidation(no Fenton reaction) compared to MQ/PQ based developers?
 
Are all ascorbic acid based developers when mixed with water undergoes rapid oxidation(no Fenton reaction) compared to MQ/PQ based developers?

No, Moersch ECO 4812 is an extremeley long lasting print developer.
 

Back in business with XTOL. For now. Long term, I don't if it will be good for my nerves.

 
If I had to pick which developing agent, ascorbic acid or hydroquinone, was more susceptible to aerial oxidation it would certainly be ascorbic acid. I have some hydroquinone that is over 50 years old that is still fine. However bottles of ascorbic acid powder have turned brown in about a year.
 
I still have some Metol and a lot of Sodium Carbonate from long ago...wonder how long that last?
 

They removed the "plus" (basically a silver sequestering agent that improved sharpness some by preventing dissolved silver from replating onto the film) because it caused problems with t-grain films. For practical purposes there's no real difference between ID-11 today and D-76.
 
I still have some Metol and a lot of Sodium Carbonate from long ago...wonder how long that last?

Metol is also very stable. If the carbonate is the monohydrate then that too is very stable,
 
I believe the Sodium Carbonate was Anhydrous...IIRC
 
I believe the Sodium Carbonate was Anhydrous...IIRC

The monohydrate is the form most often encountered. However if it is anhydrous keep it well closed and protested from moisture. It will convert to the monohydrate. The increase in weight will throw some developers formulas a bit off.
 
It's in the original plastic container. Ii used it primarily to make D-72 and the Beer's #1 and #4 formula.