dwross
Allowing Ads
I think there are actually two questions:
1. Does film have a future?
2. Does AgX photography have a future?
The answer to question 1. depends on the future demand for film. If at some time the demand for film products drop below a critical level (and none of us know what that is), film is gone.
The answer to question 2. is only a function of the interests of present and future experimental minded photographers. As long as people care enough to experiment and make their own emulsions, AgX photography will survive.
Doomsdaying the future of film is a very strange hobby. Three cheers for all the sane, affirmative voices that keep repeating the joys of film. Thanks!
Sigh..... that may have been true in the '90s, but it's not true today.
I'm about 45,000 clicks into my DeeAteHundred, I find it to be absolutely spectacular even up to 6,400, easily on par with scanned 6x6 color film when printed up to 40" wide. That said, except for the NYT assignment I did with it on Friday, it has sat idle since the first week of August and will until around Thanksgiving....
I'm about 45,000 clicks into my DeeAteHundred...
I'm about 45,000 clicks into my DeeAteHundred, I find it to be absolutely spectacular even up to 6,400, easily on par with scanned 6x6 color film when printed up to 40" wide. That said, except for the NYT assignment I did with it on Friday, it has sat idle since the first week of August and will until around Thanksgiving....
That's a number thatlike Wilt Chamberlin's 20,000immediately goes begging for a calculator. Wanna' know the difference in definitions between "vocation" and "avocation?" Combined, I don't think I've released a camera shutter that many times in my entire life...
Ken
I'm about 45,000 clicks into my DeeAteHundred, I find it to be absolutely spectacular even up to 6,400, easily on par with scanned 6x6 color film when printed up to 40" wide. That said, except for the NYT assignment I did with it on Friday, it has sat idle since the first week of August and will until around Thanksgiving....
My medium format film camera gives spectacular results too, and cost under $200. What did your D800 cost?
No doubt. I have maybe 45,000 clicks on ALL my cameras over ALL my time in the hobby. It boggles the mind that one could fire off so many shots in just the few short months the D800 has been around.
I dont think I could sustain interest in photography with so many images.
What's this got to do with the thread here?
Besides which, the figure of 45,000 would seem highly improbable...
One day in particular when one client could not re-schedule, I shot for 16 hours, over 3,000 frames, it was fun but nuts.
Remember that pre-scouted location and 4:30am wake-up for me? Well, I made it out there on time. It took a while to set up the 8x10, compose, focus, and manage the image. Then I waited for sunrise and a 15 minute window between moving tree shadows. When it arrived I loaded holders into the camera, metered the required exposure, and...
Got my two (2) hard-earned shutter clicks for the day.
The first as metered. The second slightly overexposed to support the shadows in case I made an error while metering.
Ken
P.S. Lots of strange looks from the occasional passing car, but no public seminars today. Too early for anyone to be out on a Sunday morning, I guess.
Thursday, hiked 9 miles and gained 2,300 vertical feet. I was carrying my 45N-2, 5 lenses ...
......film and photography are alive and well, good night...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?