Source: LoC
Since when does Photoshop (a trademarked software program) mean retouched or altered?

Using two or more shots for the same print goes back way earlier than that. Early landscape photographers would often dub in clouds from a different image, since those old blue-sensitive plates would overexpose the skies in the primary exposure.
Even Arthur Canon Doyle, the author of the Sherlock Holmes series, was fooled by a composite photo made by some little school girls, convincing him that fairies truly existed.
Historically, PhotoShop was aimed at handling images in the graphics industry, not the photography world per se.
It has become a photographic tool, but it didn't start out that way.
Muybridge was also a murderer, he shot his wife's lover through the heart.Muybridge was a master. Anyone who thinks Ansel Adams was the pioneer of Yosemite photography and its greatest practitioner doesn't know a thing.
Muybridge was also a murderer, he shot his wife's lover through the heart.
Source: LoC
Those don't look like computer graphics (so called "Photoshop") images. They look like composites created with traditional darkroom tools.
Yes, but there were precursors to Photoshop with much the same goals. Among them I'm reminder of Soviet photo- manipulations back in the day, and Gustav Le Gray's famous use of two negatives to add clouds to his seascapes.Agree with ic-racer. The term 'photoshop' could be considered digital conversion and manipulation. Originally there was Scitex and Paintbox where the images were converted digitally onto reel magnetic tape, before Adobe.
Yes, but there were precursors to Photoshop with much the same goals. Among them I'm reminder of Soviet photo- manipulations back in the day, and Gustav Le Gray's famous use of two negatives to add clouds to his seascapes.
The precursors were either primitive or astronomically priced and required expensive setups. The example of the OP is quite rudimentary, most likely was pasted-up, hand-retouched and rephotographed. No computers involved.
I think the 'precursors' @Arthurwg refers to aren't computer-based, either. The examples he mention predate the computer age by many decades. E.g. the Soviet photo manipulations rise to prominence at about the moment Stalin made his claim to power, so we're talking 1920s-1930s. This was, like you said, pasted-up, hand-retouched, etc.
Also, isn't the whole discussion a little silly? To me it's obvious the mention of 'Photoshop' by @DDTJRAC shouldn't be taken literally and we're talking about photomontage instead, without the aid of digital tools.
Given Photoshopped was used in quotes, it's quite clearly referring to the darkroom compositing process, rather than the software..Also, isn't the whole discussion a little silly? To me it's obvious the mention of 'Photoshop' by @DDTJRAC shouldn't be taken literally and we're talking about photomontage instead, without the aid of digital tools.
It is definitely silly and pretty much obvious and irrelevant.
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |
