• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Do you have a "style"

And I would counter that one's style is the direction that one finds their work heading.
I think it may be a bit of both. We shoot the way we do both because that is how we want to do it, and because that is how we feel compelled to do it.
Sounds like the exact same thing to me.
 
I think I've got a 'style' - I couldn't define it precisely, but I have a certain way of photographing things, from the perspective I use to the way I print things, I think my photographs are fairly easily identifiable as mine, and not confused with other people's work. There's no absolute on this - there are lots of photos I take that I take for my own enjoyment, not that I would try to show and sell, and those I think are more generic (photos of animals at the zoo, insects/flowers/other macro work, etc).
 
Hey just wandering about what is your style. In other words, what kind of look do you seek in your photographs

By clicking on your user name, then clicking the number of photos in "Media" it looks like you definitely have a consistency in the way you see and present photographs. Is it your style, or is it a phase...only time will tell!

When checking peoples "Media" (even if you only look at the thumbnails) sometimes a persons 'style' jumps right out at you.
 
My style can best be described as realist, abstract and minimalist, while being influenced by William Eggleston, Vivian Maier and Steven Shore.

But as Gary Winogrand, I am mostly driven to see what things look like on film.

I wish I could see minimalist compositions, so I must be a maximalist who likes to keep people out of landscapes, exposes properly and focuses the camera. Blurry photographs are for fuzzy minded people and I ain't one of dem.
 
Blurry, but no fuzz involved:
View attachment 283132

Ok, but I cannot get exited about it. I get similar photographs from pinhole lenses on Nikons and Hasseblads, and they are ok for a change but I do not see making 16"x20 prints for my living room of any of them.
 
Ok, but I cannot get exited about it.
I expect you mean excited (darn auto-correct).
This and a couple of other pinhole images I'm particularly fond of actually look far better enlarged to 13.5" on the long side (my favorite for enlargements) than they do viewed on a computer screen.
They seem more pregnant with hidden meaning that way.
And my poor efforts pale when you consider someone like Alexey Titarenko:
https://www.pinterest.ca/amoscarmi/alexey-titarenko/
 
I wish I could see minimalist compositions, so I must be a maximalist who likes to keep people out of landscapes, exposes properly and focuses the camera. Blurry photographs are for fuzzy minded people and I ain't one of dem.
Ansel Adams was once quoted as saying "There's nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy idea". Touche.
 
A style is the direction one is pushing one's work.

And that;s the Approach. As you later say taht's constantly evolving

I would add that my approach to landscapes is different to my photography with rock bands, and differs again with my fine art nudes, or my evolving digital work, So multi latered.

Ian
 
A style is the direction one is pushing one's work.

If you're a Dadaist and love to take inspiration from happy accidents, you could also state that a style is the misdirections one is pushing one's work.
 
This discussion reminded me of something written by David Kachel regarding the making of fine prints.

In it, he talks about Going Too Far. Much of what he says can be true with "style" as well, in that as we experiment and explore tangents to make stronger photographs, they often lead to dead ends. It's never wasted effort though...something is always learned that comes in handy later, or leads to another stylistic room to explore.



For the full article, go here:

http://www.davidkachel.com/assets/fpsecret.htm

http://davidkachel.com/wpNewDK/
 
If you're a Dadaist and love to take inspiration from happy accidents, you could also state that a style is the misdirections one is pushing one's work.

if that's the case I guess I'm a dadaist and a few other things ..
I try not to have a style I'd rather roam and graze and use whatever catches my fancy for my inspiration.
I was watching that sad movie about bob ross the other day and think I'm rossist too . 1/2 hour is just right!
 
"Look" is too primitive concept. It all looks the same after while.
I'm not into it but, I was told by some to have style.