I don't think so, though. You're just performing an operation that makes things look a little better to your eye, but there's no true information gain. In fact, there's an information degradation since you're adding non-image information to the image and you won't be able to take it out again. Besides, I'm sure there's also plenty of info online about the inherent problems of different sharpening actions interacting across different stages of the image editing process; e.g. if you sharpen the full-res scan and then sharpen again after downscaling for the web, the result may be visibly affected because you sharpened twice (e.g. jagged edges and other interference artefacts).
Things might be(come) a little different when/if AI will be applied to scanning, as you'd then be able to actually add image information that has a decent probability of being a substitute for real information. But merely stating it this way, even in this tentative formulation, is sufficient grounds to spark a heated and probably infinite debate. So perhaps let's not go there...yet.