Distortion on VC 35mm 2.5 11 lens

IMG_7114w.jpg

D
IMG_7114w.jpg

  • 2
  • 0
  • 45
Cycling with wife #1

D
Cycling with wife #1

  • 0
  • 0
  • 40
Papilio glaucus

D
Papilio glaucus

  • 2
  • 0
  • 32
The Bee keeper

A
The Bee keeper

  • 1
  • 4
  • 155
120 Phoenix Red?

A
120 Phoenix Red?

  • 7
  • 3
  • 160

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,184
Messages
2,770,766
Members
99,573
Latest member
A nother Kodaker
Recent bookmarks
0

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,271
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
The 38mm Zeiss Biogon [Hasselblad] and the 35mm f/2 Biogon ZM are the same design. Both are rectilinearly correct.
 
OP
OP

peter16

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2011
Messages
106
Format
4x5 Format
in case it's useful to someone someday here's a comparison of the 35 skopar 2.5 and a summicron 35mm v4. Both at F 4, from an 8000 dpi drum scan.
I was mainly testing for resolution here, not distortion but if you look closely you can see the summicron has less barrel distortion.

Interestingly, when really pixel peeping on my resolution targets, the skopar out resolved the summicron at all apertures in the middle of the frame. Not by much but it won every time in a side by comparison. BUT as expected the summicron blows the doors off the skopar in the corners through F8, not even close...the second screenshot is from the upper right corner of the frame at 100%
Screen Shot 2018-05-07 at 11.35.38 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-05-07 at 11.57.27 PM.png
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

peter16

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2011
Messages
106
Format
4x5 Format
full image, and center crop showing middle left target
summicron 5.6.jpg
Screen Shot 2018-05-11 at 4.13.45 PM copy.jpg
 
OP
OP

peter16

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2011
Messages
106
Format
4x5 Format
summicron f5.6.jpg Screen Shot 2018-05-11 at 4.47.34 PM.jpg a less scientific test using the same VC lens and a friends borrowed 35mm summicron Asph F2. curious if mods will take this down. some small rocks seem to evaporate on film version. However real test would be to make side by side full sized prints.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,431
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,127
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
You may also consider a summaron.
Here is a review:
https://kenrockwell.com/leica/35mm-f28.htm

I have no experience with that lens or the summicron. But experience does tell me that wide angle lenses are not their best wide open. So if using them stopped down to f4 for 5.6, why spent the extras money?
(I usually shoot at f16)
 
OP
OP

peter16

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2011
Messages
106
Format
4x5 Format
Why in the world would the Photrio mods take this down?
my last post is comparing a drum scan of film with a 24mp digital file from the Leica M240 – thought this was maybe supposed to be all analog shop talk
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,431
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
my last post is comparing a drum scan of film with a 24mp digital file from the Leica M240 – thought this was maybe supposed to be all analog shop talk
Just two ways of evaluating lens performance. Nothing particularly non-"APUG" about that.
Now if you were to stray into the digital image "capture" processes themselves - either scan or built into a camera - than you would have to pick the right areas of Photrio.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom