Digital negs for pt/pd on Epson P900 challenge

bowyerphoto

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2023
Messages
1
Location
paris
Format
Medium Format
I was so glad to see this post and advice Don. Thanks. However, my P900 will not accept pictorico in front feeder if i select No Eject Roller icon. I get a paper fault message and it ejects it. Did you ever have this? I think I need to use the media installer software to create the proper paper profile for the OHP right? Where do I find this? In EPSON software in apps folder?
 
OP
OP

LaniD

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 3, 2023
Messages
50
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
Multi Format
Hello I did still get pizza wheel marks on some after enlarging the gap (like Rollieflexible mentioned the film is thinish) and rear loading but then I reduced the gap and am rear loading and doubling the film with another sheet of film or paper and it started to work but then on the third try the second substrate separates but it looks like I'm not getting the marks. I'm still experimenting and no it wont front load so will try downloading the above Euro version - we're getting there. FYI hoping Don checks in with us and bowyerphoto and I believe the installer was in the aps that were downloaded for P900.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

LaniD

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 3, 2023
Messages
50
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
Multi Format

Alan are you front loading or rear loading? and what paper settings are you using if I may ask? Are you doing anything else different from the norm?
 
OP
OP

LaniD

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 3, 2023
Messages
50
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
Multi Format

Hey Don I'm still hitting the pizza wheels unless I use big film and move the neg around to miss the pizza marks. Do you know if installing this into the P900 will void the warranty? Just curious I thought their text did say something about unauthorized software not being covered but it probably doesn't matter now. And so you're not getting the pizza marks anymore correct?
 

MTGseattle

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Messages
1,362
Location
Seattle
Format
Multi Format
I've been watching some of these recent printer forums since I've become curious about making enlarged negatives from my 8x10 in-camera negatives. This all seems like a lot of messing around for a $1200 machine. Is Epson still the defacto winner if digital negs are desired? I swear there are happy Canon people in the forums as well.?
A used Epson P800 that popped up for sale locally is what really inspired my new reading. I'm at a technological knowledge impasse with most editing software these days. I think ultimately, I may stay within the confines of the traditional darkroom.
 

fgorga

Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
742
Location
New Hampshire
Format
Multi Format
Alan are you front loading or rear loading? and what paper settings are you using if I may ask? Are you doing anything else different from the norm?

In my experience, to eliminate the pizza wheel marks, one needs to increase the "drying time per print head pass" from the default of zero to a value of ten.

This setting is accessed by clicking on the button labeled "Paper Config..." in the P800 Windows driver (not sure where this setting is in the Mac driver, but I know that it is there.

This has worked for me on both a 3880 and on several P800s.
 

Alan9940

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
2,392
Location
Arizona
Format
Multi Format
Alan are you front loading or rear loading? and what paper settings are you using if I may ask? Are you doing anything else different from the norm?

Not sure how to label the feed position, but it's where one loads any paper that's not thick fine art rag types or poster stock. I use QuadToneRIP to print the negs with default settings.
 

fgorga

Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
742
Location
New Hampshire
Format
Multi Format

As far as I know, the large majority of folks making digital negative are using Epson printers. I bet that there are a few folks using Canon printers, but they seem pretty quiet about it.

The bottom line is that modern Epson pigment inks are know to have sufficient density in the UV to be useful for alt process negative, so most folks use them and get on with the making of 'art'.

Additionally, while $1200 is a lot of money for most of us (certainly for me) it is worth mentioning that the 3880/P800/P900 are the entry level 17" printers and that these printer are designed to print on paper. Transparency material is not part of the design specifications.

Allegedly, the next "pro level" 17" printer ) the P5370 will have a vacuum system for holding paper among other improvements. Of course this will be at a much higher cost (about $2K?).
 

Rolleiflexible

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
2,193
Location
Mars Hill, NC
Format
Multi Format
As far as I know, the large majority of folks making digital negative are using Epson printers. I bet that there are a few folks using Canon printers, but they seem pretty quiet about it.

The alt process world defaults on Epson because the Epson inks do a better job of blocking UV light than the Canon inks, and because there is far more support in the community for Epsons — more RIPs and apps that presume the use of Epsons, and many more users running Epsons. It’s not to say you can’t make a Canon work — it just means you’ll be mostly on your own figuring out how to pull a useful negative from the Canon.

Epsons are not perfect, but the P900 is much improved from earlier generations of inkjets. I know the pizza-wheel problem is not entirely a thing of the past, but it has never been an issue on my P900.
 
Last edited:

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
21,309
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
because the Epson inks do a better job of blocking UV light than the Canon inks

They have this reputation, yes. I'm not sure, however, if it holds if you compare apples to apples; i.e. a pigment Epson printer with a pigment Canon printer.

there is far more support in the community for Epsons — more RIPs and apps that presume the use of Epsons, and many more users running Epsons.

This is certainly true. In particular, QTR seems to be doing a great job of keeping people committed to Epson. But since many linearization approaches are hardware-agnostic (e.g. by producing a curve adjustment in something like Photoshop, regardless of printer platform), it seems to me that any brand or type of printer should be useful enough. Only those of us married to QTR have nowhere else to go.
 

Rolleiflexible

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
2,193
Location
Mars Hill, NC
Format
Multi Format
They have this reputation, yes.

Let me start by saying I have no direct experience here -- I wrote based on my sense of the prevailing consensus that the Canon printers are not up to the demands of creating digital negatives.

A few months back, a new PHOTRIO member @TruNeg discussed his use of Canon printers to make digital negatives through the use of a software package he had written:


In another thread, TruNeg said that he was not able to make digital negatives for alternate processes with long tonal ranges, like salt prints and VDBs, without printing two negatives and using them registered together:


I took this post as confirmation that the Canon printers are not up to Epson's standards for UV-blocking inks. To me, that is a deal-killer. As TruNeg's post confirms, using two registered negatives to build UV density adds complexity to the process and may cause optical effects that degrade the overall image.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
21,309
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
@Rolleiflexible, as I said, it's important to compare apples to apples. In the thread you linked to, an iP8760 Canon printer is used. This printer has one channel with pigment ink and the others are dye inks. The pigment ink may or may not provide sufficient blocking power for processes like salt and DAS carbon. The dye channels are likely quite sketchy for alt. process negatives. The combination of dyes and pigments in itself may also be problematic.

The story will likely be different for the Canon pigment printers like the Pixma Pro series.
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format

One person to ask about all this would be Ian Leake, who has done a LOT of work with digital negatives for Pt/Pd. I remember he got so disgusted with the pizza wheel problems on his 3880 (IIRC- might have been a different model) that he switched to Canon, but as noted he had to create two negatives to get sufficient density, which risks registration issues and softening of the printed image.
 
OP
OP

LaniD

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 3, 2023
Messages
50
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
Multi Format
Not sure how to label the feed position, but it's where one loads any paper that's not thick fine art rag types or poster stock. I use QuadToneRIP to print the negs with default settings.

Thank you!
 
OP
OP

LaniD

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 3, 2023
Messages
50
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
Multi Format

Dan I forgot to tell you thank you - the film is all good face up and dry and new...
 
OP
OP

LaniD

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 3, 2023
Messages
50
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
Multi Format
 
OP
OP

LaniD

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 3, 2023
Messages
50
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
Multi Format
Don out of curiosity do you know if the warranty will still be intact if I load European software? I couldn't find anything in their verbiage that said yes or no. I'm ready to try this...
 
OP
OP

LaniD

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 3, 2023
Messages
50
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
Multi Format
Don out of curiosity do you know if the warranty will still be intact if I load European software? I couldn't find anything in their verbiage that said yes or no. I'm ready to try this...


Don out of curiosity do you know if the warranty will still be intact if I load European software? I couldn't find anything in their verbiage that said yes or no. I'm ready to try this...
I had sent you this question incorrectly awhile back and did find the answer from Epson and that is yes I'd still be under warranty.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…