Digital/laser ra4 paper with analog exposure?

Trail

Trail

  • 0
  • 0
  • 41
IMG_6621.jpeg

A
IMG_6621.jpeg

  • 0
  • 1
  • 93
Carved bench

A
Carved bench

  • 0
  • 3
  • 146
Anthotype-5th:6:25.jpg

A
Anthotype-5th:6:25.jpg

  • 6
  • 4
  • 168

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,071
Messages
2,769,137
Members
99,552
Latest member
Jollylook
Recent bookmarks
0

geirtbr

Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2015
Messages
53
Format
35mm
I see sometimes advertisements for digital RA4 paper, I wonder if this is usable with analog exposure and if so what the difference will be from normal RA4 paper. The process itself is the same, fortunately.
 

Jim Taylor

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
151
Location
West Yorkshire, UK
Format
Medium Format
I use Fuji Crystal Archive DP-II - which is says is 'optimised' for digital exposure - works fine for me - great colours, good contrast. Needs a little less red filtration that Kodak Endura Premier. My Kodak paper is pink, Fuji is blue!
 

BMbikerider

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
2,930
Location
UK
Format
35mm
I use Kodak RA4 paper (off a bulk roll) and there is no difference between that and Fuji! Except compared to Fuji Kodak is vastly superia.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,342
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
The digital optimization means that it is optimized for very short exposures.
Which may mean that there are reciprocity failure issues with very long exposures.
 

Roger Cole

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
Which, at worst, would mean that changes of exposure time with lens stop wouldn't be quite as simple and might need another test print/strip and the filter pack might change a bit more with exposure if the layers vary in reciprocity characteristics. Those are not exactly big problems.
 

mnemosyne

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
759
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
The digital papers have higher contrast. This is very evident when you compare standard Fuji CA and DPII side by side. DPII will give you punchier colors but also more problems taming the highlights with negatives that have a wide brightness range.
 

BMbikerider

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
2,930
Location
UK
Format
35mm
Pun intended? :smile:

Actually no, it was my mix up of words/names but I stand by what I say about Kodak being better, however others may dissagree, it is just what I find
 

fdonadio

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
2,081
Location
Berlin, DE
Format
Multi Format
Actually no, it was my mix up of words/names but I stand by what I say about Kodak being better, however others may dissagree, it is just what I find

I was just trying to pull your leg. The pun, intended or not, was good, after all. Made me laugh a little.

Cheers,
Flavio
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom