• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Difference between T-Max 100 and 400 in medium format?

pared_amarilla.jpg

H
pared_amarilla.jpg

  • 0
  • 0
  • 22
December Path

H
December Path

  • 3
  • 0
  • 39

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,676
Messages
2,828,391
Members
100,882
Latest member
Photriо
Recent bookmarks
0
OP
OP

pkr1979

Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2019
Messages
567
Location
Oslo
Format
Multi Format
I am gratified by all the kind comments on Kodak T-MAX Films. I was the product development engineer and by the time it was introduced Worldwide B&W Product Manager. Because the team working on the project was small, I was responsible for everything from the business case and pricing to writing the specification to measuring the performance to deciding on emulsion performance trade-offs to selecting the names to designing the packaging to presenting the announcement press conference. Gordon Brown suggested the name by combining the T for tabular and MAX for DMax (maximum density) . As I recall I started the work January 1, 1981, almost 45 years ago. The time has flown by, I was having fun.
www.makingKODAKfilm.com

Thanks for chiming in @laser - I would love to hear your take on this :smile:
 

MarkS

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 12, 2004
Messages
542
TMX vs. TMY?

TRY IT.

same day, same subject, same lighting. Expose some of each, bracket for insurance purposes.
Develop per your choice.
Print them as big as you want,
Then you'll know.

There are so many variables here (including your own taste) that no one else's answers will work for you.
 

David R Williams

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 6, 2017
Messages
128
Location
Calgary, Alberta
Format
Multi Format
I am gratified by all the kind comments on Kodak T-MAX Films. I was the product development engineer and by the time it was introduced Worldwide B&W Product Manager. Because the team working on the project was small, I was responsible for everything from the business case and pricing to writing the specification to measuring the performance to deciding on emulsion performance trade-offs to selecting the names to designing the packaging to presenting the announcement press conference. Gordon Brown suggested the name by combining the T for tabular and MAX for DMax (maximum density) . As I recall I started the work January 1, 1981, almost 45 years ago. The time has flown by, I was having fun.
www.makingKODAKfilm.com

Thanks for your reply Bob.

As a happy owner of your second edition, I was very interested to learn so much about the film design and manufacturing process.

I, and I suspect many more, would love to hear more of your experiences in the development of the TMax films, and the trade-offs that were made (and perhaps the considerations that went into such trade-offs) to the extent it wouldn't compromise any confidential commercial information or NDA's that you may still be subject to.
 

Arthurwg

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
2,953
Location
Taos NM
Format
Medium Format
I couldn't see grain in TMY, TMY-2 using my little Paterson "grain" focusing scope, several years ago I found a used Micromega focusing scope could finally see it. I don't make really big enlargements mostly 8x10 from medium format negs. I have used mostly TMY for the last 30 years along with XTOL. These films and the T-grain Kodak color negative films were revolutionary. Still are.

Yes, I don't use it because I can't see the grain to focus. NowlLooking for a Micromega.
 

ags2mikon

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2009
Messages
715
Location
New Mexico
Format
Multi Format
I'v been using it exclusively as my 400 speed black and white film for the last 5-6 years. I develope it in D-23 1:1 and I have been very happy. I still have some 4x5 left that was passed on to me when a friend passed away. I will just bite the bullet and buy more when it is gone.

Didn't Kodak have a recomendation for using Tmax 100 and Microdol X to replace Panatomic X?
 

Craig

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
2,522
Location
Calgary
Format
Multi Format
Didn't Kodak have a recomendation for using Tmax 100 and Microdol X to replace Panatomic X?

I believe so. The grain on PX wasn't all that fine for it's low speed. TMX is undoubtedly a better film.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
10,080
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I am not sure when discontinued PanX and Tech Pan followed by Plus X stating that TMax 100 has finer grain and better resolution than all 3. I doubt that Tmax has better resolution than Tech Pan which was microfiche type film. My 1990 Kodak Professioanl Black and White Films guide does not list Panx or Verichome Pan but recommends Tmax in Microdol X stock at ISO 50 and 100 at 1:3.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
15,931
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
I am gratified by all the kind comments on Kodak T-MAX Films. I was the product development engineer and by the time it was introduced Worldwide B&W Product Manager. Because the team working on the project was small, I was responsible for everything from the business case and pricing to writing the specification to measuring the performance to deciding on emulsion performance trade-offs to selecting the names to designing the packaging to presenting the announcement press conference. Gordon Brown suggested the name by combining the T for tabular and MAX for DMax (maximum density) . As I recall I started the work January 1, 1981, almost 45 years ago. The time has flown by, I was having fun.
www.makingKODAKfilm.com

You folks did a heck of a Job! I recall hearing on NPR (US National Public Radio) I listened to an actual radio back then. There was a story about a revolutionary development from Eastman Kodak that would allow much finer grain and higher sensitivity for film!
Well I certainly was very excited to hear that! I remember when 35mm Tri-X had clumpy grain.

I have both editions of your book, priceless!
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,913
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
Hi all,

When comparing these two films in medium format - at what enlargements will you notice a difference in sharpness, resolution and grain?

Cheers
Peter

purely subjective opinion: grain is not an issue with either film. They hardly have any. TMX seems a bit contrastier and sharper(my favorite for landscape and architecture). TMY is a bit softer with better gradation(my favorite for skin tones in female portraits and nudes).
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
14,852
Format
8x10 Format
There's no difference is gradation between the two speeds. The characteristic curves make that fact quite apparent. That would simply be an artifact of unequal development. And I think you reversed the two otherwise, Ralph. TMX100 is softer edged.
 

david schaller

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
37
Format
Large Format
I am gratified by all the kind comments on Kodak T-MAX Films. I was the product development engineer and by the time it was introduced Worldwide B&W Product Manager. Because the team working on the project was small, I was responsible for everything from the business case and pricing to writing the specification to measuring the performance to deciding on emulsion performance trade-offs to selecting the names to designing the packaging to presenting the announcement press conference. Gordon Brown suggested the name by combining the T for tabular and MAX for DMax (maximum density) . As I recall I started the work January 1, 1981, almost 45 years ago. The time has flown by, I was having fun.
www.makingKODAKfilm.com

Thank you for your efforts! Quite an achievement! TMY is my go-to medium format film. (For large format I can't afford to use the T-MAX films at the current prices.)
 

Ben 4

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
282
Location
Lancaster, P
Format
Medium Format
Thank you for your efforts! Quite an achievement! TMY is my go-to medium format film. (For large format I can't afford to use the T-MAX films at the current prices.)

I've settled on TMY as my standard medium format film—though I don't print larger than 11x14 (though I do crop sometimes). Even on a tripod I find the extra speed helpful when the wind is moving through the foliage.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom