- Joined
- Aug 22, 2006
- Messages
- 1,321
- Format
- 35mm RF
I have no clue who he is, but I stand in awe:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/16536699@N07/sets/72157622905229717/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/16536699@N07/sets/72157622905229717/
If you look at my scans they say "EOS 5D Mark II" because I use such a camera with a bellows and macro lens to "scan" my negatives. So, that does not say too much. And how a photographer works is circumstantial for me when I like his photos, and that was the only reason why I showed this.
Or, if that should be digital work: how would you do this on film?


Opinions differ apparently. No surprise there.
I don't think they're over the top at all.
I'm curious though, how much of the dislike expressed above stems from (a percieved) digital origin and ditto post processing?

Apart from the filter and printing, I consider using something like a Pan F, in 35mm or better 120, and push it 2 stops in XTol. That might keep the grain small but create a lot of contrast. In 120 size Microphen might be an even better choice because I remember it creating very high contrast when pushing HP5.

| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |
