Diafine in rotary processors

Stark

A
Stark

  • 6
  • 5
  • 81
Mayday

A
Mayday

  • 2
  • 1
  • 70
Gear(s)

A
Gear(s)

  • 5
  • 2
  • 65
Post no Bills

A
Post no Bills

  • 2
  • 0
  • 67
Women and Child

A
Women and Child

  • 0
  • 0
  • 104

Forum statistics

Threads
197,722
Messages
2,763,355
Members
99,451
Latest member
Kap867
Recent bookmarks
0

bobfowler

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 18, 2003
Messages
1,441
Location
New Jersey,
Format
Multi Format
I've heard that Diafine isn't recommended in rotary processors (Jobo, Unidrum, etc). As an experiment, I went ahead anyway and processed some J&C Classic 200 5X7 sheets that I exposed at EI 400 in a Unidrum. The overall negative density was very high, and aside from the negatives being a bit flat (expected), the results weren't too bad at all. The film is a bit grainier than when processed in Microdol-X 1:3 (also expected), but the results were still quite good. A test scan of one negative is (there was a url link here which no longer exists).

My question: Would it help reduce the overall density if I diluted either or both parts of the Diafine before processing when using in a rotary tube? If so, does anyone have any dilution starting points I can try?
 

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
You might get away with diluting one hell of a lot. I doubt part B
could be so; all that agitation. Dan
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,112
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
I've used Diafine with Bath A diluted 1:49 for microfilm, to control contrast while still gaining speed; it gives a good EI 100 with Copex Rapid, but the contrast tends to be on the flat side and there's no underexposure latitude at all. Overall density isn't much changed -- Dmax looks very similar to what I get with other films, after allowing for the crystal clear base of microfilm stock.

Essentially, diluting Bath A means less developer will carry over into Bath B, where it is activated; that will result in increased compensating action and further reduced contrast. Working against that, the constant agitation in a rotary processor may tend to wash the Bath A out of the emulsion too quickly, resulting in reduced development that won't be helped by reducing the amount of developing agent present with dilution.

Bottom line, diluting Bath A will result in underdevelopment. If your density is too high, rate the film at a higher EI (try 500, 640, maybe even 800). Given that the developer is fully reusable other than carry over loss of Bath A, you might try developing a single 5x7 sheet wrapped inside a double-120 stainless tank without reels, using the recommended agitation (as you would for roll film) and a full tank of liquid, as a comparison. If you find anithalation dye that hasn't completely washed out of the film at the end with this process, rewash in HCA or multiple changes of water, in a tray or similar to clear the dye.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom