• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Diafine in rotary processors

Shadow play

A
Shadow play

  • 11
  • 1
  • 75

Forum statistics

Threads
201,232
Messages
2,820,918
Members
100,605
Latest member
Fishzzz
Recent bookmarks
1

bobfowler

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 18, 2003
Messages
1,441
Location
New Jersey,
Format
Multi Format
I've heard that Diafine isn't recommended in rotary processors (Jobo, Unidrum, etc). As an experiment, I went ahead anyway and processed some J&C Classic 200 5X7 sheets that I exposed at EI 400 in a Unidrum. The overall negative density was very high, and aside from the negatives being a bit flat (expected), the results weren't too bad at all. The film is a bit grainier than when processed in Microdol-X 1:3 (also expected), but the results were still quite good. A test scan of one negative is (there was a url link here which no longer exists).

My question: Would it help reduce the overall density if I diluted either or both parts of the Diafine before processing when using in a rotary tube? If so, does anyone have any dilution starting points I can try?
 

dancqu

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
You might get away with diluting one hell of a lot. I doubt part B
could be so; all that agitation. Dan
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,513
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
I've used Diafine with Bath A diluted 1:49 for microfilm, to control contrast while still gaining speed; it gives a good EI 100 with Copex Rapid, but the contrast tends to be on the flat side and there's no underexposure latitude at all. Overall density isn't much changed -- Dmax looks very similar to what I get with other films, after allowing for the crystal clear base of microfilm stock.

Essentially, diluting Bath A means less developer will carry over into Bath B, where it is activated; that will result in increased compensating action and further reduced contrast. Working against that, the constant agitation in a rotary processor may tend to wash the Bath A out of the emulsion too quickly, resulting in reduced development that won't be helped by reducing the amount of developing agent present with dilution.

Bottom line, diluting Bath A will result in underdevelopment. If your density is too high, rate the film at a higher EI (try 500, 640, maybe even 800). Given that the developer is fully reusable other than carry over loss of Bath A, you might try developing a single 5x7 sheet wrapped inside a double-120 stainless tank without reels, using the recommended agitation (as you would for roll film) and a full tank of liquid, as a comparison. If you find anithalation dye that hasn't completely washed out of the film at the end with this process, rewash in HCA or multiple changes of water, in a tray or similar to clear the dye.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom