Development Problem

Camel Rock

A
Camel Rock

  • 3
  • 0
  • 36
Wattle Creek Station

A
Wattle Creek Station

  • 4
  • 0
  • 39
Cole Run Falls

A
Cole Run Falls

  • 2
  • 2
  • 31
Clay Pike

A
Clay Pike

  • 4
  • 1
  • 32

Forum statistics

Threads
198,938
Messages
2,783,520
Members
99,752
Latest member
Giovanni23
Recent bookmarks
0

shidareyanagi

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Messages
2
Location
Osaka, Japan
Format
35mm
sky12.jpg Just developed my first ever roll of film in a stainless steel LPL tank.
Film: FujiFilm Neopan 100.
Developer: Kodak D-47 (7minutes 30 seconds)
Stop Bath: Acetic acid (50%) 80ml diluted in 2 litres of water (1 minute)
Fixer: Ilford Hypam Fixer (9 minutes)

12 frames came out fine but others came out with these big white holes. Some pictures seemed like they had been virtually erased. Any ideas what is causing this?
sky12.jpg
rsz_sky9 (1).jpg
 

RobC

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
3,880
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
film was touching film. Probably not wound onto spool properly.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,034
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Welcome to APUG.

You have experienced one of the rights of passage of developing film.

If you haven't done so, try practicing loading the reel with a discarded roll of film. First with your eyes open, then with them closed, then in the dark.

Pay close attention to how the film feels and sounds as it loads correctly, and when it goes wrong.

And most important - have fun!
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,380
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Welcome to APUG

If the reel continue to be a problem, then get Hewes stainless steel reels.
 

jvo

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
1,751
Location
left coast of east coast
Format
Digital
Welcome to APUG.

You have experienced one of the rights of passage of developing film.

If you haven't done so, try practicing loading the reel with a discarded roll of film. First with your eyes open, then with them closed, then in the dark.

Pay close attention to how the film feels and sounds as it loads correctly, and when it goes wrong.

And most important - have fun!


yeh - what he said! how it "feels" is the key - goes on the reel easily... and welcome to apug.

jvo
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
There is an easy and simple test to prevent this problem from happening. There should be some slack felt when you grab the end of the film on the reel and gently pull and push it. If it won't move the it has kinked somewhere. Try this when you practice loading in the light.

The Hewes reels are very nice and more sturdy than cheaper ones. But they are still reels and subject to the same loading problems that others have.

To prevent kinking when loading the film it should be cupped slightly as it is eased onto the reel. As the old joke goes, "How do you get to Carnegie Hall? Practice, practice, practice."

In the past people interested in photography bought how-to books. They usually contained a pictorial on how to load SS reels. It is an easy process that unfortunately is harder to explain in words.
 
Last edited:

mooseontheloose

Moderator
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
4,110
Location
Kyoto, Japan
Format
Multi Format
That doesn't look like film touching itself to me. The emulsion wouldn't be gone entirely, it just wouldn't have developed.

There are lots of videos on YouTube on how to load stainless steel reels - good way to see if that's what the problem is.
 

bence8810

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
377
Location
Tokyo
Format
Multi Format
I had the exact same white patches showing when I loaded a longer than normal 135 roll and the end didn't fit into the reel. I just rolled it around the reel and loaded into the tank. I assumed it was touching something and the developer couldn't get to it but Never worked on identifying the cause as I know it won't happen again. I am careful now to load my film and turn the crank exactly as many times as I should for a 36 frame roll. The joy of hand loading film...

Ben
 

RobC

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
3,880
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
That doesn't look like film touching itself to me. The emulsion wouldn't be gone entirely, it just wouldn't have developed.

There are lots of videos on YouTube on how to load stainless steel reels - good way to see if that's what the problem is.
or fixed so would be as dense as unexposed film which would be dense on a scanner and show as white.
 

Xmas

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
or fixed so would be as dense as unexposed film which would be dense on a scanner and show as white.
My unexposed film comes out as clear base like rebates...
It would be dark like shadows if scanned and presented as positive.
The white splurge has density on the negative, more than dmax.
But some of the surround to splurge has a dark area.
It would be nice if we could see the rebates and better in a negative format?
Could we see a smart phone photo of negative strip in front of table lamp shade.
 

RobC

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
3,880
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
unexposed will come out clear because its fixed. But it won't be fixed if film is touching just like it wasn't developed.
 
Last edited:

Xmas

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
unexposed will come out clear because its fixed. But it won't be fixed if film is touching just like it wasn't developed.
I accept that but I'd still like to see the negative in front of table lamp.
I've never managed touching in frame maybe cause I don't use stainless reels.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom