but there is a limitation of 3oz (88ml) containers for liquid
So; bags of white powder in your luggage; what's the problem?
Come to Kyiv! I will find you here almost any developer that is only now possibleFlying out from the US is not a problem carrying film. The problem is flying back from Europe. I will be in this situation later this year. I am considering shipping my exposed film back to home before flying back.
Come to Kyiv! I will find you here almost any developer that is only now possible
You are paranoid about scanners. They will not harm your film, so process all on return.
If I HAD to do this, I might consider a pouch of Cinestill DF 96, which, as you as know, is a one solution developer/fixer preparation. If I recall correctly, it is also fairly tolerant to different temperatures, but I don't recall the details; I'm sure that you can retrieve any information about this product from the web.
Here's a pain-free alternative: use a film guard bag, take it in the carry on and bring rolls back home to develop. I've used mine (which can hold up to 30 35mm rolls) in the US, Europe and South America. I've only been stopped once, also in Italy, and all they did was open the bag and look inside. Oh, and my bag supposedly protects film up to 400 ASA, but I've traveled with 3200 and never had a problem.
I'd be more concerned with finding photographic grade dark to load a developing tank than transporting chemicals. Finding a reasonably dust free place to hang negatives to dry might be a problem too.
That being said, my grandfather told me stories of developing film in Italy when he was there with the Canadian Army in 1944. He did it at night in the back of a covered truck and rounded up a few helmets to use as containers for the chemicals and did a see-saw agitation through the chemicals while holding the film. I expect the world was much darker at night then and film was a lot slower.
It's good to know about the new CT scanners. I guess I've only encountered x-ray ones (according to the explanation here about whether you're made to take things out of the carry on or not) and I've had no issues. And I just remembered that coming back from Argentina in July, I even had an unfinished roll in the camera and there's nothing unusual in it. Oh, I've never sent the film in the checked luggage, btw.The new CT scanners will either go right through these, or you will be pulled into the "slow" line because the scanners won't work, and you will be looked at with heightened suspicion.
And the scanners used for checked packages are much more powerful than these bags can handle.
All those bags really do now is protect your film with radiation from sources other than scanners.
It's good to know about the new CT scanners. I guess I've only encountered x-ray ones (according to the explanation here about whether you're made to take things out of the carry on or not) and I've had no issues. And I just remembered that coming back from Argentina in July, I even had an unfinished roll in the camera and there's nothing unusual in it. Oh, I've never sent the film in the checked luggage, btw.
As for heightening suspicion or getting pulled, which rarely happens and takes 30 extra seconds, I don't care LOL
I do not want to carry around uncut negatives in my luggage where they can be creased or damaged.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?