I'm quite amazed at the results. Should this work with just about any C-41-film? How about C-41 B&W film?
years ago, i had a student develop some xp c41 film in the lab. The film had a serious magenta color but it printed.
I take it these are neg scans rather than print scans? Have you done any prints from any of the negs. While a print is the ultimate test I can see no reason why the prints shouldn't be very good.
What are the other stages after the B&W developer? Did you do this just to see how a colour neg film would look after a B&W process or is colour film in N Calif cheaper to develop as B&W than buying a traditional B&W film?
Thanks
pentaxuser
ampguy. Thanks for the explanation. I notice that the most recent negs seem to be normal i.e. look like B&W negs whereas the first set had various casts but were then converted. How did you do the converson and what explains the difference between the first scans of the cat and the later scans of it?
Incidentally I thought some of the casts on the first set of scans of the cat negs were interesting. Pity that in normal B&W paper prints they couldn't be directly translated into toned prints. I wonder if the residual colour in the cat scans of the original negs would produce nice ones on RA4 paper?
pentaxuser
Interestingly, unlike others, with Reala I get a brown/sepia tone, not a magenta cast on what the negatives look like.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |