Mark
Bad choice of words. I should have said ... [/I]
Figured as much.
One of the biggest struggles we have here at APUG (as in the rest of our world) is that the concepts we try to express often get muddled in the language we commonly use.
I think part of the problem here is that the normal vocabulary used tries to tie specific subject placement to a specific point on the negative.
This goes back to the way the various zone systems have been taught and I think it's is also rooted in how transparencies and jpeg's are still shot. It is just easier for people to follow the logic path if there is a fixed (best) exposure target.
When we step into the nebulous world of negatives though, where there is a whole range of exposure placement choices that can and do produce very good results and where there is no "best" placement (except for one's own personal best), it gets tougher to explain.
