Designing T-Max Films: TMX speed; In response to David Williams' request

David R Williams

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 6, 2017
Messages
112
Location
Calgary, Alberta
Format
Multi Format
Ok, so confession time...my acutance issues may be due to an oversight on my part due to my much (un)loved Omega C760's negative stage and my ageing eyes.

When all fails, check everything....and maybe some other stuff too...

My C760 is bolted to the wall using a wall support base on the bottom of the column and top mount for the column head which together rigidly attaches the column to the wall.

However, that wall is subject to load from above and unfortunately part of that load is a torture test: our washer and dryer are on the floor above the basement darkroom and that wall is hung from the joists of the floor above.

So, the wall is subject to periodic vibration which shouldn't be a problem as long as I'm not printing while laundry is in-process, but it seems that the highly "adjustable" negative stage in the C760 shifts it's negative stage alignment as the result of it's less than optimal engineering.

Specifically, the negative stage is designed with a sprung base under the negative carrier and relies upon the lamphouse positioning to hold the negative holder in alignment using 4 adjustment screws at the back of the lamphouse. These screws are quite difficult to use to align the lamphouse and negative carrier (even with a laser alignment tool) and quite apparently, and I've now determined will shifting due to vibration.

After checking and re-aligning the enlarger last night and reprinting a 120 TMX neg developed in Perceptol 1:3, the 16x20 test size enlargement is crisp, sharp, smooth and detailed everywhere, especially in off-centre parts of the image that are best to evaluate acutance.

Lesson learned - I'll confirm alignment before any meaningful printing session.
 

MTGseattle

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Messages
1,442
Location
Seattle
Format
Multi Format
I just tried to google the date of transition from old tmax to TMY-II and I do not trust the results I am seeing. I have a chance to get some 2008 confirmed frozen Tmax 400 in 4x5 for a really attractive price compared to current retail.
 

Milpool

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 9, 2023
Messages
892
Location
n/a
Format
4x5 Format
TMY-2 was released Oct 2007
I just tried to google the date of transition from old tmax to TMY-II and I do not trust the results I am seeing. I have a chance to get some 2008 confirmed frozen Tmax 400 in 4x5 for a really attractive price compared to current retail.
 

David R Williams

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 6, 2017
Messages
112
Location
Calgary, Alberta
Format
Multi Format
I just tried to google the date of transition from old tmax to TMY-II and I do not trust the results I am seeing. I have a chance to get some 2008 confirmed frozen Tmax 400 in 4x5 for a really attractive price compared to current retail.

Do you have an image of the packaging available?
 

Milpool

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 9, 2023
Messages
892
Location
n/a
Format
4x5 Format

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
2,871
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format

I have found DK-50 to give very low fog but tending toward more grain for a given film than, say, HC-110 or D-76. For MF and larger, it was never much of an issue, though.
 

John Wiegerink

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
3,865
Location
Lake Station, MI
Format
Multi Format
I have found DK-50 to give very low fog but tending toward more grain for a given film than, say, HC-110 or D-76. For MF and larger, it was never much of an issue, though.
I remember using DK-50 with some old Ultrafine Extreme 100 film in 120 and it worked very nicely. I figure that with 120 Tmax and its fine grain DK-50 might just be the cat meow.
 

djdister

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 6, 2012
Messages
195
Location
Maryland USA
Format
Multi Format
I remember using DK-50 with some old Ultrafine Extreme 100 film in 120 and it worked very nicely. I figure that with 120 Tmax and its fine grain DK-50 might just be the cat meow.

I recall using DK-50 for 4x5 and 5x7 Ektapan and Tri-X many years back - it was an easy developer to work with and clean working.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
15,526
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format

This is too technical for my feeble mind.

I just go back to 1940's Kodak "brilliant negatives" "fine grain" "snappy" or good old Ilford Hypersensitive Panchromatic. That's proper film speak.