• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Delta 400, the bastard stepchild?

Roger Cole

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
Steve Smith said:
I don't push film very often but I have had more success pushing D400 to EI 800 and 1600 than I have with using D3200 at these speeds.


Steve.
Click to expand...

That's... interesting. I've never tried D3200 lower than 3200 because I rely on Tri-X in Diafine for those speeds. But I get superb results-for-the-speed with Delta 3200 at 3200.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Xmas

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
pentaxuser said:
Interesting and useful Steve, given the price premium that is charged with D3200

pentaxuser
Click to expand...

Well it is risky but you can also shoot Kentmere at 800 ISO in Microphen at Ilfords normal times and temp if you meter religiously like Ansell.

If you additionally try Barry Thortons 2nd bath for 1/3 the time again you will have different shadow detail both more detail and more compression - almost normal negatives.

Depends on how much you like split grade printing relative to Kentmere being cheaper again and more grainy- I like grain...
 

ghart

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 26, 2002
Messages
33
Location
Chester, UK
Format
Medium Format
I'm very pleased to read of Simon Galley's support for Delta 400. The OP asked about favorite (sp?) and forgiving, and my answers are yes and yes! For what I do this film is a winner in the tonality department, because it translates the values from top to bottom with an even-handedness that other films don't. Some are better at low values, others at mid, but Delta 400 in MF does the whole range in a way that mimics the competence of large (here meaning >5x4) format.

Forgiveness implies sin at the time of exposure and like every other film, this one needs iteration to find the optimum settings. For what it's worth, I expose at EI 200 and develop for 8 min in ID-11 1+1, at 20 degC. Mainly outdoor work, spot metering, etc. etc. As they say YMMV, and probably does.

Delta 400 has quality tonality.

George

PS I happen to reside in Cheshire but I have no connection with Harman Technology Ltd, other than as a happy user of their products!
 

photo buddy

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
10
Format
Large Format
your delta

Never had a problem processed it in recipe compounded D72 for 8 minutes.
 

Thomas Bertilsson

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,715
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
I agree 100% with your assessment of shooting the same film to learn how it works in all situations, David.

I've been shooting Tri-X for a year or two, switching from using TMax 400 for a long time. While my prints have a bit more grain now and are not as sharp, the most striking realization is that my pictures are not of better or worse quality than they were before. Just slightly different.
I'm sure that if I shot with HP5+ or Delta 400 my resulting photographs would be hugely similar to what they are today, and experience with shooting a few rolls of HP5+ here and there indicate the same. Sometimes I receive film for free from generous souls, and I end up using it because I can't resist free materials. If I had to purchase all my film I would most definitely keep coming back to a single emulsion.


 
OP
OP

Richard S. (rich815)

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format
What spurred me to post this is that I have a few bricks of Delta 400 that I got for a good price a year or so ago. I used it for landscape shooting and just haven't gotten the snap, or the look that I like but then again haven't worked with it that much. When searching APUG did not find many threads on it.

I shot a roll yesterday of my wife, little girl and her friends with my Hasselblad 500CM and 150 Sonnar with an old Metz 36CT3 flash and then developed in HC 110 dilution B for eight minutes 18 C. The results are actually stunning. I'll post some samples later.

Now to dial it in for landscape work too. At least I know I can shoot it at a friends wedding in a couple of weeks and get what I'm looking for portraits and such with this flash. Thanks again for everyone's thoughts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Thomas Bertilsson

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,715
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format

Delta 400 has a shoulder, which means the highlights taper off at the top end compared to HP5+ and TMax 400, which offer a straighter line and more highlight contrast.

I imagine D400 would be great for portraits because of the shoulder, like FP4+. It's probably best to use Delta 400 with a developer that is not compensating, like Edwal 12 or something like HC-110 that offers a somewhat upswept curve compared to other developers.
 

Arcturus

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 13, 2012
Messages
95
Format
Medium Format
For some reason I can't seem to get Delta 400 to work right. I use Ilfotec HC and D76 but Delta 400 always comes out super grainy, much more so than HP5+ even. I don't have this problem with any other tabular style films, TMX/TMY-2, Delta 100/3200, Acros 100 etc. It's not the films fault, but something I do in processing just doesn't agree with it.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
55,288
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Simon R Galley said:
I have to say it is one thread title that I could'nt miss.....!

DELTA 400 is a deeply loved and cared for child, one of our 400 iso family that we adore.

Simon ( Dad ) ILFORD Photo / HARMAN technology Limited
Click to expand...

So are you saying that Delta 400 is Harman's love child?

:devil:
 

polyglot

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,467
Location
South Australia
Format
Medium Format
Steve Smith said:
I don't push film very often but I have had more success pushing D400 to EI 800 and 1600 than I have with using D3200 at these speeds.
Steve.
Click to expand...

Well, that is good to hear because at this point, I trust Kodak about as far as I could throw them in terms of ability to stay in business.

But better than D3200? I loves me some D3200 and that's a big call.

Simon R Galley said:
I have to say it is one thread title that I could'nt miss.....!

DELTA 400 is a deeply loved and cared for child, one of our 400 iso family that we adore.

Simon ( Dad ) ILFORD Photo / HARMAN technology Limited
Click to expand...

So, Dad, are you going to send your lovechild to Sheet Film University with his little sister, Pan-F?
 

StoneNYC

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
8,345
Location
Antarctica
Format
8x10 Format
L Gebhardt said:
I would shoot it if it was available in sheets. As it is I use mostly TMax 400 since I can get it in both 120 and sheets. But I do like Delta 400.
Click to expand...

Agreed, I'm on the fence, because I would like to be all Illford (except acros100 for reciprocity and spectral response reasons) but I want something finer than HP5+ sometimes and delta400 isn't available in sheet so I've sort of been forced to switch to TMY-2 out of wanting to be able to move up and down formats without having to learn a new film.

He only's exception I'm making is for PanF+ because it's just that good... I'm just hoping someday ilford will actually come out with it in sheet. But I know there are reasons not to, just like HP5+ if Delta400 were available then it possibly cuts into the HP5+ market more than the TMY-2 market, so could PanF+ cut into the FP4+/Delta100 market more than it might the TMX/Acros100 market.

Such is life...
 

Roger Cole

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
HP5+ and Tri-X are quite fine grained enough for me, at least in medium format much less 4x5. Bottom line is that I never see grain in any print I make from 4x5 regardless of the film so I choose 4x5 film on other criteria, and very rarely in prints (up to 16x20, the largest I can make) from medium format. I will grant that if I printed to 16x20 from one of my 645 negs, or cropped to that from 6x6, and cropped a bit I might get a bit more from Tri-X (I can see it in 11x14s but it's hardly bothersome) but I think even then it wouldn't be a problem.

Those who shoot 35mm black and white and print large have more cause to be concerned with grain. I've pretty much stopped shooting black and white in 35mm since I got a couple of medium format cameras and a few lenses for my 645, the exception being "available darkness" where the speed of my 35mm lenses becomes a big advantage.
 

Athiril

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
3,062
Location
Tokyo
Format
Medium Format
Delta 400 is one of my favourite landscape films. I dont do this for increased shadow detail or lower contrast, but I shoot it at 100, and process it in replenished Xtol @ 24 degrees with minimal per minute agitation, 2 gentle inversions per cycle, dev time is very short, it takes on a different kind of character that isn't simply contraction.
 

Xmas

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF

but I like grain... need to go larger than 10x8 with D400
 

Roger Cole

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
If you like grain it doesn't make any sense to use any t-grain film. Use the fastest and most conventional and old-school film you can find.

My recommendation would be Fomapan 400. Push it a bit but be careful as it builds contrast very rapidly.
 

Steve Smith

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,110
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
Roger Cole said:
That's... interesting. I've never tried D3200 lower than 3200 because I rely on Tri-X in Diafine for those speeds. But I get superb results-for-the-speed with Delta 3200 at 3200.
Click to expand...

It's strange (and good) that we all get different results from different films. I love the look of Tri X in the photographs of others which I have seen but have never had any luck with it myself. Probably because I have only ever used two rolls!

Equally, there are many Delta 3200 photographs I have seen which I like, despite not getting anything like the same results from it myself.


Steve.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
20,023
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Delta 400 is a beautiful film. I used to like it particularly in Perceptol. I'd use it all the time, if it were available in sheet sizes, but when I asked about it, as I recall, they weren't making it because of a coating issue, and it would have to be reformulated to work with the sheet film base.
 

Roger Cole

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
They used to make it in sheets. I still have a frozen box from the 90s. Maybe the emulsion has changed in some way to make it incompatible but I don't know.
 

kintatsu

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
366
Location
Bavaria, Ger
Format
4x5 Format
Roger Cole said:
Ah yes - I shouldn't have forgotten XP2 Super. I was the one over on LFPF saying if you made it in sheets I'd order C41 chems for the Jobo the next day. It's a wonderful film.
Click to expand...

I developed some XP-2 Super in Ultrafin 1+20 last year. It was 120, shot a 70 year old Ikoflex, in snowy and foggy conditions. I metered for 200. The bright part were slightly overexposed, but the shadows were nice. Given enough film and time, I probably would have worked up a system to use it in B$W chemicals.


This was shot Feb 2012, and developed for 13.5 minutes in Ultrafin 1+20. Sorry about my scanning skills, or lack thereof.

I decided to try it after all the labs close to me got all my prints either greenish or reddish-brown. Don't even try it with BW400 from Kodak. You end up with an unprintable gob of arange and black, almost like it hase no mids due to the orange mask. The XP-2 comes out clear, just like any other film, and the mask washes away.

I haven't tried Delta 400, as I'm shooting 4x5, but Delta 100 is great stuff. My current fave is FP-4+. I figure if I work with just FP-4+ and HP-5+, I'll get to know them enough to make something good!
 

Keith Tapscott.

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Messages
1,845
Location
Plymouth. UK
Format
Multi Format
Simon R Galley said:
I have to say it is one thread title that I could'nt miss.....!

DELTA 400 is a deeply loved and cared for child, one of our 400 iso family that we adore.

Simon ( Dad ) ILFORD Photo / HARMAN technology Limited
Click to expand...
Simon, why isn't it available in LF sizes like Delta 100?
 

kintatsu

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
366
Location
Bavaria, Ger
Format
4x5 Format
Keith Tapscott. said:
Those are my personal favourites. I also like Delta 100.
Click to expand...

I've managed to get FP-4+ tested. With my meter and camera, it comes in at box speed. HP-5+ needs some testing for EI and development. It's interesting to me, that I started out liking HP-5+ better, but now I prefer FP-4+. Something about the images. Maybe it's just that I've learned more and need to go back to the HP-5+, as I haven't shot it in about 9 months.

I tried the Delta 100, but only used a few sheets. What I got was good, but testing is required before I can use it seriously, as my times were off for my development. With only 5 sheets, and no more for a while, that's going to have to wait! I'll likely use up my last 5 sheets for some Christmas time photos.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register