Found this intriguing patent, that AFAICS proposes the use of the Herschel effect for using bog standard film (IR sensitive film would actually be bad, again AFAICS) for recording pretty deep into the infrared spectrum. And what's more due to the desensitising effect of the Herschel effect the capture is a positive.
The only catch seems to be that you need to give a brief post exposure flash right after, or in fact preferable as a continuation of the IR exposure. That could be tricky to achieve with a normal camera, but certainly possible.
Could this be a substitute for HIE?
Edit. A further possibility is that stuff like D400 could actually be faster in ”Herschel” reversal mode. Even with a 720 filter.
Would be pretty easy to test.
Who gets there first‽![]()
The best substitute is a real infrared film such as Rollei IR 400 shot at box speed and then adjusted for the filter.
In some of my examples, especially the one of all trees, the foliage is rendered white. That tells me that there is more going on than just extended exposure. It is very doubtful that this will happen to a film sensitised up to 650nm. The next sunny day, I'll go out with some HP5 and prove it.
Found this intriguing patent, that AFAICS proposes the use of the Herschel effect for using bog standard film (IR sensitive film would actually be bad, again AFAICS) for recording pretty deep into the infrared spectrum. And what's more due to the desensitising effect of the Herschel effect the capture is a positive.
The only catch seems to be that you need to give a brief post exposure flash right after, or in fact preferable as a continuation of the IR exposure. That could be tricky to achieve with a normal camera, but certainly possible.
Could this be a substitute for HIE?
Edit. A further possibility is that stuff like D400 could actually be faster in ”Herschel” reversal mode. Even with a 720 filter.
Would be pretty easy to test.
Who gets there first‽![]()
A close reading of that patent suggests that they were hitting the emulsion with enough mid-IR CO or CO2 laser light to heat and in the extreme test cases to actually damage the emulsion, leading to the desensitization.
To quantify this, their visible light fogging exposure was typically at surface brightness of 0.2 microwatts per sq mm for 1/50 sec, while the mid-IR laser exposure was at 3-10 milliwatts per sq mm for 5-10 sec. It is confusing because the table in Fig 6 uses "mw/mm^2" for both milli- and micro-watts (for which the authors should be punished), so one has to read the caption.
In 1975 this may have been interesting as a means to detect 5 to 10 micron IR light with conventional photographic emulsions, but today there are other ways of detecting mid-IR light. Pictorially ... Godspeed and good luck.
I recently shot some Rollei Infrared, but when I was testing that I also found an old Hasseblad back with very old HP5+. I took a few shots using my SuperwideC and that old HP5+ with the 720 filter. I didn't write anything down exposure wise on those shots, since I figured there'd be nothing too good. You would be surprised how HP5+ and a 720 filter look. Certainly not HIE film, but certainly worth doing some more experiments with. JohnW
I'd love to see that HP5 shot!
Andy,
I'm at home and not at my cottage where everything is at. I'm going to the big city while I'm here and will buy a 4 or 5 rolls of HP5+. When I get back up north, I'm going to use a couple of rolls with the 720 filter. I'll keep track of exposure and development better this time. That old, old roll of HP5+ had mottling severely and it was the first time I have ever had a bad roll of HP5+. Certainly not Ilfords or anybody's fault but mine.
Yeah, I read the laboratory jargon and use cases.
Unfortunately the Herschel effect seems to have terrible reciprocity failure.
So perhaps an initial exposure with a destructive IR exposure following?
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |