Degradation of film during processing.

Looking back

D
Looking back

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
REEM

A
REEM

  • 3
  • 0
  • 64
Kitahara Jinja

D
Kitahara Jinja

  • 4
  • 0
  • 59
Custom Cab

A
Custom Cab

  • 4
  • 2
  • 76

Forum statistics

Threads
197,608
Messages
2,761,810
Members
99,415
Latest member
SS-5283
Recent bookmarks
1
OP
OP
Nikon 2

Nikon 2

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2023
Messages
1,528
Location
Moyers, Oklahoma
Format
Multi Format
Making a 4x6 print from a 35mm negative either colour or B&W you would be very hard pressed to see any degradation be it sharpness, grain, or colour balancer providing it is printed properly. I prefer prints from film they are to me anyway, more natural and non of the over sharpened and over saturated images.

What is the point of this question anyway, it looks as if you have already made up your mind.

By asking these questions shows I’m still not sure about film processing and surely haven’t made up my mind on anything…!
 

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
2,025
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format
Is it true when developing film there is some degradation by processing whereas it’s avoided from a SD card directly to your computer…?

Both digital and analog media are subject to degradation over time. Analog endures no particular image loss during development, but can fade with time if not processed properly, or become mechanically compromised if not stored or handled properly.

Digital media is subject to "bit rot" wherein the data loses integrity due to the properties of the storage medium, cosmic ray bombardment, and so forth.

Properly processed analog film should well outlast digital media in almost every case. The fix for that is to make multiple, independently located backups on different media types. There are companies that specialize in offsite storage of backups so that you can survive even a catastrophic facility lost.

ProTip: SD Cards, Flash Drives, and their various cousins are very unreliable backup media. For local (i.e., In you office or home) storage, some form of redundant storage is recommended like a small NAS.
 
OP
OP
Nikon 2

Nikon 2

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2023
Messages
1,528
Location
Moyers, Oklahoma
Format
Multi Format
Both digital and analog media are subject to degradation over time. Analog endures no particular image loss during development, but can fade with time if not processed properly, or become mechanically compromised if not stored or handled properly.

Digital media is subject to "bit rot" wherein the data loses integrity due to the properties of the storage medium, cosmic ray bombardment, and so forth.

Properly processed analog film should well outlast digital media in almost every case. The fix for that is to make multiple, independently located backups on different media types. There are companies that specialize in offsite storage of backups so that you can survive even a catastrophic facility lost.

ProTip: SD Cards, Flash Drives, and their various cousins are very unreliable backup media. For local (i.e., In you office or home) storage, some form of redundant storage is recommended like a small NAS.

Good to know and what makes SD Cards or Flash Drives so unreliable?
I just started using digital just months ago after many years of shooting film…!
 
Last edited:

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
2,025
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format
Good to know and what makes SD Cards or Flash Drives so unreliable…?

The nature of how the electronics work means that they have a limited number of read/write cycles. That's why you're told to copy stuff off a camera SD onto a serious storage medium for critical files.

But no electronic storage medium is really that reliable - hence the need to do offsite and duplicated backups. We have analog film over 100 years old that is entirely usable for making prints but even 30 year old digital storage is showing a lot of cracks already.

All the world is an analog stage and digital technology is but a bit player ...
 
OP
OP
Nikon 2

Nikon 2

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2023
Messages
1,528
Location
Moyers, Oklahoma
Format
Multi Format
The nature of how the electronics work means that they have a limited number of read/write cycles. That's why you're told to copy stuff off a camera SD onto a serious storage medium for critical files.

But no electronic storage medium is really that reliable - hence the need to do offsite and duplicated backups. We have analog film over 100 years old that is entirely usable for making prints but even 30 year old digital storage is showing a lot of cracks already.

All the world is an analog stage and digital technology is but a bit player ...

Digital storage has an Achilles heel…!
 

snusmumriken

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
2,369
Location
Salisbury, UK
Format
35mm
The image on the computer is size 11x16 using SD card or flash drive for film…!

Exactly. And the screen is probably brighter than the paper base.

I suggest you should get to see some top quality exhibition prints made optically from 35mm film, and then decide about the degradation inherent in each pathway.

But you should use whichever you find most satisfying and convenient, it’s not a decision for us to make in this forum.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,524
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
As others have stated or asked, what sort of degeneration are you thinking about, loss of resolution, loss of apparent sharpness, increase in grain size? Then comparing digital to analog is sort of apples and oranges. With a high resolution digital sensor, low ISO, image taken in raw and viewed in raw on a properly calibrated monitor is going to have very highs resolution, at 11X14 good sharpness, and I doubt you see any pixilation. For detail work, hard to beat. On the other film, what film, B&W or color, what ISO, if color print or slide, if printed how, injet, R4? Then size, as this is a 35mm thread. In general using a ISO 100 speed film, properly developed, printed 11X14, camera on a tripod, remote or cable release good prime or high quality zoom, I don't think you could look at the negative and the print and say there was any loss. If using a slide film that is projected and compared to a 11 X 14 digital print made with a Fuji Frontier you would at least a subjective comparison.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,011
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Do you consider music to have "degraded" because it needs to go from sheet music to a performance of some type?
 
OP
OP
Nikon 2

Nikon 2

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2023
Messages
1,528
Location
Moyers, Oklahoma
Format
Multi Format
Exactly. And the screen is probably brighter than the paper base.

I suggest you should get to see some top quality exhibition prints made optically from 35mm film, and then decide about the degradation inherent in each pathway.

But you should use whichever you find most satisfying and convenient, it’s not a decision for us to make in this forum.

I use Blue Moon Camera and Machine for optical film printing …!
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,524
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I use Blue Moon Camera and Machine for optical film printing …!

With modern digital mini labs both negatives and slides to print is one generation. File to print is one generation, file to monitor is one generation. If you have a slide optical printed using an enlarger then you a need an internegative so a slide to print with a enlarger is 2 generation. (I think anyone maks color directive positive paper any more)
 
OP
OP
Nikon 2

Nikon 2

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2023
Messages
1,528
Location
Moyers, Oklahoma
Format
Multi Format
Depends who is performing :wink:

How do you make a rock guitarist play quieter? Put sheet music in front of them.

Unplug the amplifier…!
 

BMbikerider

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
2,916
Location
UK
Format
35mm
Pure film based B&W is one of the most stable forms of recorded image. Developed, fixed and washed properly, then printed followed by selenium or sepia toning will ensure that the images stay usable for at least 100 years. The negatives if kept in perfect conditions away from air born pollution for reprinting, will last for a similar time possibly longer maybe for at least 150 years. There was an English photographer called Frank Meadow Sutcliffe who recorded images of life, people and places in and around the eastern England coastal town of Whitby from the mid to late1800's are as good now as when first taken. Just google the name.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,011
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Depends who is performing :wink:

How do you make a rock guitarist play quieter? Put sheet music in front of them.

I can think of a few really clear exceptions of rock guitarists who read sheet music, and are certainly not always quiet! One particular example:
 
OP
OP
Nikon 2

Nikon 2

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2023
Messages
1,528
Location
Moyers, Oklahoma
Format
Multi Format
Pure film based B&W is one of the most stable forms of recorded image. Developed, fixed and washed properly, then printed followed by selenium or sepia toning will ensure that the images stay usable for at least 100 years. The negatives if kept in perfect conditions away from air born pollution for reprinting, will last for a similar time possibly longer maybe for at least 150 years. There was an English photographer called Frank Meadow Sutcliffe who recorded images of life, people and places in and around the eastern England coastal town of Whitby from the mid to late1800's are as good now as when first taken. Just google the name.

I’m starting to shoot B&W…!
 

Chan Tran

Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
6,668
Location
Sachse, TX
Format
35mm
When you make a print from the negative you can not get all the details/quality there are on the negative. Besides it's another generation the printing paper can not show all the dynamic range there is in the negative as the dynamic range is compressed on the negative. Any imperfection on the enlarging process like alignment, lens quality etc.. will affect the quality.
When you copy the image files from on media to another you do not lose anything. For example if you copy the file from the SD card to a thum drive, put it in the computer copy to the hard disk, upload to the cloud then down load again on another computer nothing is lost. But when you display the file on the screen as an image you do not get everything there is available in the file. The same thing about limited dynamic range, color gamut, screen resolution etc.. reduce the quality you can get from the file when you display it.
 
OP
OP
Nikon 2

Nikon 2

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2023
Messages
1,528
Location
Moyers, Oklahoma
Format
Multi Format
When you make a print from the negative you can not get all the details/quality there are on the negative. Besides it's another generation the printing paper can not show all the dynamic range there is in the negative as the dynamic range is compressed on the negative. Any imperfection on the enlarging process like alignment, lens quality etc.. will affect the quality.
When you copy the image files from on media to another you do not lose anything. For example if you copy the file from the SD card to a thum drive, put it in the computer copy to the hard disk, upload to the cloud then down load again on another computer nothing is lost. But when you display the file on the screen as an image you do not get everything there is available in the file. The same thing about limited dynamic range, color gamut, screen resolution etc.. reduce the quality you can get from the file when you display it.

Thank you for that information…!
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,730
Format
8x10 Format
What a bunch of crock! Light has to jump through all kinds of secondary hoops to acquire a digital image to begin with. Then it's lossy again when you manipulate it to print it. And when you do print it, it's highly probably the output medium will be less precisely nuanced than in traditional darkroom technique. How about a level playing field in this discussion?
 
OP
OP
Nikon 2

Nikon 2

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2023
Messages
1,528
Location
Moyers, Oklahoma
Format
Multi Format
What a bunch of crock! Light has to jump through all kinds of secondary hoops to acquire a digital image to begin with. Then it's lossy again when you manipulate it to print it. And when you do print it, it's highly probably the output medium will be less precisely nuanced than in traditional darkroom technique. How about a level playing field in this discussion?

What about the SD card direct to the computer…?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,011
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
What about the SD card direct to the computer…?

It still gives you nothing but data - nothing that by itself constitutes an image.
 
OP
OP
Nikon 2

Nikon 2

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2023
Messages
1,528
Location
Moyers, Oklahoma
Format
Multi Format
It still gives you nothing but data - nothing that by itself constitutes an image.

It’s amazing what you can get from an SD card…!
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,011
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
It’s amazing what you can get from an SD card…!

It is amazing what you can get from a lot of things - even bags of discards:
Slides - discards.jpg

It all turns on what you do with what you have.
 

dasBlute

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Messages
421
Location
San Jose, CA
Format
Multi Format
whatever floats your boat. imperfection is beauty. some of the best images ever made by anyone are out-of-focus, blurry, grainy, underexposed, overdeveloped, vignetted, printed from cracked glass plates. perfection is a fool's errand, and will never make an image better than the idea behind it.
 
OP
OP
Nikon 2

Nikon 2

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2023
Messages
1,528
Location
Moyers, Oklahoma
Format
Multi Format
I’m still not clear what the original question was. Is it basically digital vs analogue? And are we talking colour or b/w?

My assumption of degradation (generation loss) only applies to the processing of film not from an SD card to computer…!
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom