DD-X / Ultrafin Plus 1+9 dilution - any disadvantage?

about to extinct

D
about to extinct

  • 2
  • 0
  • 89
Fantasyland!

D
Fantasyland!

  • 9
  • 2
  • 132
perfect cirkel

D
perfect cirkel

  • 2
  • 1
  • 127

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,748
Messages
2,780,357
Members
99,697
Latest member
Fedia
Recent bookmarks
1

Tom Kershaw

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
4,974
Location
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
I've just experimented a couple of times with using Tetenal Ultrafin Plus at 1+9 dilution rather than the 1+4 or 1+6 option listed in the instructions, partly to achieve slightly longer processing times when running at 24ºC in a Jobo, and also as I've found the 1+4 option rather "strong" for regular 100-400 ISO film processing. I have a hunch that dilution might adversely alter effective film speed and shadow detail but most reports online give anecdotally positive feedback for higher dilutions in the case of these products.

Any views?

Tom
 

miha

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
2,961
Location
Slovenia
Format
Multi Format
Ultrafin Plus or the T-Plus?
 

miha

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
2,961
Location
Slovenia
Format
Multi Format
Hi Tom, I have always found the grain to be significatly coarser in DD-X. The smoothest TRI-X negs I have ever seen came from now defunct Ultrafin Plus. I don't consider this two developers to be similar.
 
OP
OP

Tom Kershaw

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
4,974
Location
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
Hi Tom, I have always found the grain to be significatly coarser in DD-X. The smoothest TRI-X negs I have ever seen came from now defunct Ultrafin Plus. I don't consider this two developers to be similar.

I've only used T-max developer and Ultrafin Plus recently. I didn't realise DD-X was that different. My usual stock is XTOL.

Tom
 

miha

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
2,961
Location
Slovenia
Format
Multi Format
It isn't that different, same PQ family, 1+4 dilution, good keeping, but the grain.... way too coarse for me but the negs print easily. Sorry for diverting your thread.
 

miha

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
2,961
Location
Slovenia
Format
Multi Format
I like DD-X for LF tray development. Easy to print 4x5 negatives. For 35mm Ilfotec HC is my choice. I have recently purcased a bottle of LC29, should be similar/same Ilford say.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom