jp80874 said:Frank,
I applaud you for your efforts and intentions. You really have a comprehensive and responsible list. Skimming through all this text again, I don't think I saw anything about a face mask and breathing filter for your own protection. I use one from B&H with natural charcoal filters, but I can't find it on their site now to give you a link. I have seen many references on APUG to HEPA filters which are probably even safer than what I have. If you find one or someone else has a link I would like to know about it also.
I go along with locking the door rather than the cabinet. In my own experience, second marriage, no kids first time, former Remington arms pro with guns and ammo, marrying an elementary school teacher with early teen age kids, I would suggest a combination lock. Young kids have an amazing ability to sniff out keys and use them when you aren't home. My wife tells the story of grade school kids being trained not to even touch firearms, then in the absence of parents being filmed picking them up, pointing them at each other and one hopes dry firing. I used a combination lock on the guns and ammo cabinet and then locked the key to the Porsche in there as well.
Go with the Nitrile gloves. Another source mentioned in another thread was Wal-Mart.
Wal-Marts gloves are the one size fits all. They will do for me but a little tight. Next box will be from a source that has a larger size.
Good luck. Keep them healthy.
Your north OH neighbor.
John Powers
Aggie said:pyrogallol, is derived from the galls on walnut trees, and in some cases the walnuts themselves. We need to ban everything with walnuts if it is so dangerous..... The worst thing about pyrogallol is when it is a dry form. You breathe it and it can cause respiratory problems. That is why we encourage people to mix it in well ventilated areas, or wearing a mask. In the wet form it is harmless other than if it is to you personally a skin irritant. We are becoming so fearful of things we have swung the other way to banning dihydromonooxide like they did in Dana Point California. Cadmium is still one of the ingredients used in some topical medicinal ointments. Pyrogallol is in red hair dye. Don't get me started on non homemade hotdogs.
When I was in high school my grandmother had a concrete block building built in the backyard because of complaints by the rest of the family about the smells from my chemical experiments. It was built like a dynamite shack so that the force of any explosion would be deflected upwards.disfromage said:As a child his parents let him use a room next to the garden for his "experiments", so he would be able to toss burning and explosive substances outside and not burn the house down.
raucousimages said:Just be smart. Don't eat, drink or breath chemicals and wash your hands. Most things in our darkrooms are very safe used properly. I have used far more dangerous chemicals in worse conditions in my employment than in my darkroom and I was still within OSHA, MIL and EPA specs. I have been in the darkroom for thirty years (I do come out once in a while) with no ill effects. If we scare our children about the darkroom instead of educating them about proper chemical handling where will the next generation of wet process photographers come from? If you want a real scare take a close look at what is in your garage, garden shed, laundry room and under your sink's. Some of those chems are spookey.
TheFlyingCamera said:If you need respiratory protection, charcoal filters will only suppress odors, not block organic vapors.
Wayne said:No, pyro is not "harmless" in the wet form. This is completely wrong. Where do you get these notions of yours? It is toxic, and can be absorbed through the skin. It is poisonous to the liver and kidneys if ingested or absorbed. It is toxic to aquatic life. Will you please stop spreading unfounded rumors of harmlessness? If handled (and disposed of, I might add) properly it poses little risk to anyone or anything, but that doesnt make it a harmless substance. Overreacting to the potential danger isnt helpful, but neither is pretending that they dont exist.
Wayne
Kino said:Strangely enough, I used to play with Mercury as well.
Fumes condensed in this pipe and Mercury pooled in the
bottom of the 3" diameter pipe.
Of course in the process of collecting it, we had to roll it
around in our hands and let it run through our fingers...
Somehow I am still alive.
Now at work, if we drop one Kodak Process Thermometer,
the Hazmat Team has to be called out, the building
evacuated and a day's work scratched while the
area is decontaminated.
dancqu said:The FDA has warned against the consumption of several
species of fish. New borns are not to be fed any Albacore
Tuna and other tunas only in reduced amounts. Where
ever the rain falls. Dan
Aggie said:anw not gonna get angry about this,,,,,,naw must remain calm,,,,,to hell with that! DO a GOOGLE SEARCH on pyrogallol and the second listing that pops up after the MSDS will be this link http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/P/PY/PYROGALLOL.htm
HMMMMMMMMM ever wonder about that?
Do I ever wonder about WHAT? If you think you are being clear, think again
Maybe those skin diseases are just not smart enough to know that MSDS sheets are worse case scenerios? In the wet form it doesn't go into the respiratory system unless you snort the liquid. READ VERY CAREFULLY the MSDS and you will find it is all about the inhalation.
I have read the MSDS and I dont interpret it that way at all. Thats because they dont say that.
The other things are there but if you were to see an attached risk evaluation stat chart I think the .0005% that might develop those problems would be a risk I would take. Gordon Hutchings who revived pyro, never even wears gloves when he works with his pyro formulas. That I knwo from standing next to him a darkroom while taking his workshop.
And my grandfather smoked for 70 years and didnt die of lung cancer. Do you think that proves anything? You continually use pointless little anecdotes and little else to bolster your argument.
Now why do I know worry about it for myself? Because if you go to a Hairdresser and get their botles of chemicals for red hair dye.....which has to be applied to the scalp.....it contains pyrogallol. I've been this shy and retiring my whole life so any problems from it have not happend to me and I get direct contact that doesn't go away. It stayed on my head until I would cut it off.
And what is the concentration of pyrogallol in hair dye? Thats an important part of this equation--an actual fact-that you have left out. By the way, pyrogallol is illegal in cosmetics in some countries, though without examining it further that fact in itself doesnt mean any more than your anecdotes. But it is more thought-provoking.
As to proper disposal get real. Pyro oxidizes extremely fast! It is inert long before you would dump it down a drain. That straight from Chemistry classes. OH by the way did I tell you I did study a little Chemistry? A little degree about Molecular biochem hangs on my wall. That was earned in 94.
So on one hand we have you with a degree in biochemistry saying one thing, and on the other hand we have the vast majority...well no...ALL...published data including but not limited to MSDS painting another picture. I am not a chemist, but I know a good factual argument when I see one. So far I havent seen one from you. If you are a biochemist, you should be able to do a much better job of explaining and supporting your argument. Please do.
Scare tactics and false claims are exactly why people are afraid of the word chemical. I've even heard on man say that my arms were going to turn to stone from using pyro, even when I had gloves on so they wouldn't get stained. He was the same person who said that using potassium ferricynide to bleach out pictures would kill me, because I was gassing the whol byuilding and others would die as well.
Yes, well I'm very sorry about your past bad experiences but I am not that person and I am not saying anything even remotely similar. I am simply responding to your cavalier and irresponsible statement that pyro is harmless aside from inhalation of the powder. I am also sick of being accused of using "scare tactics" by you. It appears that you havent read or comprehended anything I've written
Lack of knowledge and spreading false old wives tales does not engender us to those who want analog photography stopped because of exactly what you have claimed.
RESPECT CHEMCIALS BUT DO NOT BE AFRAID OF THEM!
LEARN ABOUT THEM, AND NOT JUST FROM THE MSDS. THERE IS MORE INFORMATION THAN THE WORST CASE SCENERIOS. You might not put your foot in your mouth next time.
What a particular thing to say. As I mentioned before it's all in the dose. In small amounts fluorine is an important trace element in the human body, important for strong bones and teeth. Take too much and its poisonous. Tooth enamel is made of a mineral called fluoroapatite. When there is too little fluoride in the human diet then tooth enamel consists of hydroxyapatite which is softer and more susceptable to decay.Aggie said:Yet that same government puts flouride in our drinking water supply and manufacturers are putting it in baby formulas. Did you know Fouride is one of the most toxic poisons known to man? It is also a substance that kills your thyroid gland? I would be more worried about the flouridated water supply than most the chemicals we use for photography. Ever wonder why many of the countries in the world have banned flouride?
Wayne said:I hardly feel the need to remove my foot from anywhere for pointing out the obvious problems with your statements about chemical safety and disposal, and the lack of anything but anecdotes and appeals to (your) authority to back them up. Although I'm not a chemist, I do know someone who has been a chemist with EPA for over 40 years. I will run some of your ideas past him and report back if cares to comment on it. I'm not sure if this will fall under his area of expertise anymore than having a darkroom and a degree in biochem makes it fall under yours. I'm sure if he differs with anything you say he will be labelled an ultra-paranoid scare-monger though.
Wayne
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?