In scientific terms, these two are called Schrödinger Developers, i.e., simultaneously both the same and not the same when observed from a photography-devoted forum.
"This life as you now live it and have lived it, you will have to live once more and innumerable times more; and there will be nothing new in it, but every pain and every joy and every thought and sigh and everything unutterably small or great in your life will have to return to you, all in the same succession and sequence."
— Friedrich Nietzsche
Perhaps each time we answer Umut's questions so thoroughly that he never needs to participate further but as koraks says we have said it all before and it's all already on Photrio, often in one long previous thread in the case of this question
Perhaps each time we answer Umut's questions so thoroughly that he never needs to participate further but as koraks says we have said it all before and it's all already on Photrio, often in one long previous thread in the case of this question
It's called "SEARCH"! I have to admit that I have, on occasion, committed the sin of asking here before searching myself. 30 lashes to me with a wet noodle.
That suggests that D76 is somewhat more active than ID11 at higher dilutions. Perhaps the Ph is higher. Maybe Ilford skimps on the borax. Or perhaps the times could be the same and the results virtually identical. Maybe they think, if you use D76, you want your film to be lower-contrast - especially if you water it down.