D-23 vs Pyro

Hensol woods

Hensol woods

  • 6
  • 2
  • 68
Harbour at dusk

A
Harbour at dusk

  • 2
  • 0
  • 54
blossum in the night

D
blossum in the night

  • 1
  • 0
  • 39
Brown crested nuthatch

A
Brown crested nuthatch

  • 2
  • 2
  • 69

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,715
Messages
2,779,776
Members
99,685
Latest member
alanbarker
Recent bookmarks
0

DonW

Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2020
Messages
502
Location
God's Country
Format
Medium Format
This is NOT meant to be a face off between D-23 and Pyro. Any form of Pyro.

I have used Pyro-Cat since it first came out for 95% of my film developing. I love it. Plain and simple. It prints well and scans well.

However, several photographer I follow on Instagram and I enjoy their photography are using D-23.

For those with experience with BOTH developers what do you see as the major difference between the two.

It's not that one is better in all instances, but in general use for formats from 35mm to LF I'm interested in your feedback.
 

Alan9940

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
2,421
Location
Arizona
Format
Multi Format
Like Andrew, I'd be hard pressed to tell the difference other than the obvious stain of Pyrocat. I do enjoy Pyrocat for its ability to control highlights in a film that builds contrast quickly; like Fomapan 100, for example.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,916
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
A nice thing about D-23 is how simple the formula is. Two ingredients + water, and it can do anything any other general purpose developer can do.
You can even use a replenishment system with it as demonstrated by John Finch of Pictorial Planet fame.

pentaxuser
 
Joined
Jul 28, 2016
Messages
2,717
Location
India
Format
Multi Format

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,916
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Yes. At one time D-23 was popular with some labs.
On checking the supply situation however the one problem that exists in the U.K. is that a supply of the extra ingredient for replenishment, namely sodium metaborate is now down to one stockist that I can find and the price is pretty high.

The other stockist who imports from Photographer's Formulary in the U.S has a notice that his Online shop is closed until mid November. Sodium metaborate is clearly not easy stuff to source from within the U.K.

pentaxuser
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,957
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
I guess 1:10 dilution of D-23 spiked with 0.5g Sodium Hydroxide per liter of working solution will give high acutance and crisp grain while being very economical.

Maybe I should give that a go with Pan F....
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,916
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
I guess 1:10 dilution of D-23 spiked with 0.5g Sodium Hydroxide per liter of working solution will give high acutance and crisp grain while being very economical.
What is it that as little as 0.5g of Sodium Hydroxide per litre does that allows such a large dilution of 1:10 to work and does crisp grain mean much larger grain than would be true of 1+3? It is certainly more economical and makes D23 an incredibly cheap developer

Thanks

pentaxuser
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,916
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Thanks Michael. I suppose that what I was a little doubtful of is the cost of the trade-off in terms of quality at 1+10.

Has anyone tried it and if so what does, say, a 8x10 print look like from such a negative developed in this way. If there was little effect on print quality then wouldn't everyone be doing it?

Thanks

pentaxuser
 
Joined
Jul 28, 2016
Messages
2,717
Location
India
Format
Multi Format
Apparently there were such acutance developers in the market as per Jerry Koch's post. One of them was Ethol Blue, which according to Jerry, "was on the market for about a decade." So there must have been quite a few users for such caustic Metol developers. @pentaxuser your question in post #18 is probably best answered by those who have used a developer like Ethol Blue in the past or by yourself.

FWIW I have used D-76 1:10 dilution spiked with 0.35g/l of Sodium Hydroxide in 35mm. And somebody on my suggestion tried it on 120 format TMax 100 and their scans looked good to me.
 
Last edited:

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,957
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
Shot a roll of Pan F at EI 25 and developed it in D-23 1+10 for a total working solution of 500ml, with the addition of 0.2g of Sodium Hydroxide. Total development time was 18 minutes at 20C. Agitation was three seconds every two minutes. Here is an example from the roll. These shots were all shot with my Rolleicord, handheld. The increase in acutance is impressive. Thank you Raghu, for the tip!

RiverviewTreeHole_PanF_D23_.jpg
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,643
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
On checking the supply situation however the one problem that exists in the U.K. is that a supply of the extra ingredient for replenishment, namely sodium metaborate is now down to one stockist that I can find and the price is pretty high.

The other stockist who imports from Photographer's Formulary in the U.S has a notice that his Online shop is closed until mid November. Sodium metaborate is clearly not easy stuff to source from within the U.K.

pentaxuser
Maybe I'm wrong this but it was my understanding that metaborate was an optional ingredient.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,916
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Maybe I'm wrong this but it was my understanding that metaborate was an optional ingredient.
From what I have seen, Ralph. It is not required for D23 but is for replenished D23. If in fact you can successfully replenish D23 with stock D23 then that would be great as it keeps things much simpler more and avoids the cost and supply problem of sodium metaborate

Has anyone tried replenishing D23 with stock D23 with success?

Thanks

pentaxuser
 
Joined
Jul 28, 2016
Messages
2,717
Location
India
Format
Multi Format
From what I have seen, Ralph. It is not required for D23 but is for replenished D23. If in fact you can successfully replenish D23 with stock D23 then that would be great as it keeps things much simpler more and avoids the cost and supply problem of sodium metaborate

Has anyone tried replenishing D23 with stock D23 with success?

As you're probably aware, D-23 is a Metol based developer. When you reuse the developer, it accumulates bromide, a byproduct of development, which inhibits the activity of Metol. Replenishing D23 with stock D23 is not going to help you in countering this unless you use large amounts which makes replenishment non-economical. Therefore, Metaborate is used in D-23 replenisher to increase pH of used D-23 and thereby bring its activity back to the original level. Now, XTol doesn't have this problem because it is uses Phenidone which is not so sensitive to Bromide accumulation.

As I have written previously, it is very easy to make Metaborate from Borax and Sodium Hydroxide, two commonly available chemicals. If you want to take replenished D-23 route, just make some Metaborate and use it.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,916
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
As you're probably aware, D-23 is a Metol based developer. When you reuse the developer, it accumulates bromide, a byproduct of development, which inhibits the activity of Metol. Replenishing D23 with stock D23 is not going to help you in countering this unless you use large amounts which makes replenishment non-economical. Therefore, Metaborate is used in D-23 replenisher to increase pH of used D-23 and thereby bring its activity back to the original level. Now, XTol doesn't have this problem because it is uses Phenidone which is not so sensitive to Bromide accumulation.

As I have written previously, it is very easy to make Metaborate from Borax and Sodium Hydroxide, two commonly available chemicals. If you want to take replenished D-23 route, just make some Metaborate and use it.
Thanks for that. It is as I thought and stated to Ralph. My reasoning was that if it was that easy just to use D23 to replenish D23 then the use of metaborate would not be mentioned in the video I had seen on the subject by John Finch of Pictorial Planet. I have seen a lot of his videos and my conclusion is that he is very reliable. However it is good to see the scientific explanation

pentaxuser
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 28, 2016
Messages
2,717
Location
India
Format
Multi Format
I guess 1:10 dilution of D-23 spiked with 0.5g Sodium Hydroxide per liter of working solution will give high acutance and crisp grain while being very economical.

I developed two short strips of Orwo UN54 with 1:10 dilution of D-23 spiked with 0.5g Sodium Hydroxide per liter of working solution. I used 600ml of working solution in my Patterson two reel tank. 20 minutes @20C, continuous agitation for first minute and then 10 seconds at 2, 4, 8 and 16 minutes mark. Negatives look good to my eyes.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,957
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
I developed two short strips of Orwo UN54 with 1:10 dilution of D-23 spiked with 0.5g Sodium Hydroxide per liter of working solution. I used 600ml of working solution in my Patterson two reel tank. 20 minutes @20C, continuous agitation for first minute and then 10 seconds at 2, 4, 8 and 16 minutes mark. Negatives look good to my eyes.

I'm quite pleased with this combination. Pan F is wonderful in this on bright, sunny days it seems. Once again, thanks for the tip.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom