D-2 Vignetting Problem

Val

A
Val

  • 0
  • 0
  • 3
Zion Cowboy

A
Zion Cowboy

  • 1
  • 1
  • 19
.

A
.

  • 2
  • 2
  • 52
Kentmere 200 Film Test

A
Kentmere 200 Film Test

  • 4
  • 2
  • 123
Full Saill Dancer

A
Full Saill Dancer

  • 1
  • 0
  • 120

Forum statistics

Threads
197,777
Messages
2,764,116
Members
99,466
Latest member
GeraltofLARiver
Recent bookmarks
0

dfloeter

Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2005
Messages
14
Format
Multi Format
I have installed a Zone VI cold light in my ancient but solid Omega D-2 and found slight vignetting on 4x5 negs. Burning the edges cures the problem but I would rather not. Has anyone else had this a problem and is there a solution such as using a longer lens? I currently have a 135 Rodagon 5.6.

Thanks
 

Huram

Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
70
Format
35mm
You are using a cone with your 135mm lense, right?
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
1,355
Location
Downers Grov
Make sure the tubes in the head travel across the 5" dimension of the neg.

The tubes might be getting old and you get less light from the bends.

Check if there is something between the tubes and diffuser. Buy a new diffuser if you can`t prove it is the original.
 

Bobby Ctkr

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2005
Messages
2
Format
Large Format
Probably the diffuser

I had the same problem with my B8. Rigged the diffuser and now, no vignetting. I actually put the diffuser/piece of round, snowy plastic, between the negative carrier and the "cone" that rests on the carrier. Light leaks, but works for me for now.
 

Claire Senft

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
3,239
Location
Milwaukee, W
Format
35mm
There was a review about 15-20 years ago in Darkroom magazine of the Zone VI coldlite head. I believe that the review was written by Ctein. He noted that the head vignetted with the use of a 135mm lens in printing 4x5 negatives.

Zone VI was started by a gentleman by the name of Fred Picker. He was capable of being quite 'crusty'. outspoken and combative. He was also a skilled photgrapher.

He wrote a letter to Darkroom magazine stating that the fault was entirely due to the 135mm lens being used. He stated that using a 150mm lens would have coImpletely eliminated this problem. He was more than generous in offering the opinion that anyone but an idiot would know that a 135mm focal length enlarging lens is too short to properly cover a 4x5 negative. Please understand that I am paraphrasing based upon a article read long ago. The remarks about a 135mm lens not being able to cover a 4x5 negative is NOT a position I support.

However, since the Mr Picker was certainly in a good position to know his product's capabilities I would strongly recommend that you try a 150mm enlarging lens and see if the problem disappears.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom