This info comes from my supplier (AG Photographic) who supplied my Fotospeed LD20 lith developer: "Foma Fomatone 131, 132, 532, 542 are papers well known as good Lith papers as well as Fomabrom 123. Customers have also had great results using Adox Fine Print Vario Classic and Adox MCC".
I would be interested in hearing if anyone has used the Bergger papers, I want to do a series this winter and would like to give this company a go.
Thats interesting, I will try to give some of the papers a go, I am also trying out their WT version for a couple of purposes.Coated by Harman I believe, though not sure how much of the emulsion technology is from Guilleminot & how much is Harman's - been thinking about trying the semi-gloss WT, though not for lith.
I consulted Tim Rudman's blog (last updated 2013) which said emulsions on lots of papers had changed and no longer lith well.
I would be interested in hearing if anyone has used the Bergger papers, I want to do a series this winter and would like to give this company a go.
I personally do not use facebook and actuallyl do not own a cell phone, My company does and is managed by Carissa here, so I would not know how to get to that group as I am a real luddite when
it comes to facebook.
I don't use my phone for Facebook, you can access it via any web browser. It's actually kind of a pain on a phone.
I'm 55 and scratch my head at people posting every single dinner photo and the whole "my life is amazing and my every random thought is fascinating" social media stuff. But the Lith group on Facebook is an example of how well it can work. I've seen some really inspiring work (there's a kid in Europe shooting pinhole with lith who deserves a major gallery show), chatted with some interesting people across the globe, picked up some good techniques, and the yearly print exchange makes the world feel a little smaller. Great resource for anyone new to lith printing (or wanting to perfect it - Wolfgang posts lots of tests and comparisons for instance).
From the April 2015 newsletter from Tim Rudman:
Foma
...As stated, Foma have been further testing and refining these papers and have now issued new advice in the technical data sheet and supplement for lith. This information arrived here just minutes ago. I shall be testing the new emulsions in due course and will let you know my findings.
Some of the paper-developer combinations as recently mentioned in the Lith Printing Group on Facebook:[
Yes, the technical data mentioned is often incomplete or dubious, unfortunately.Unfortunately, they do not give information concerning the age of the paper.
I try to limit my computer time to APUG and LARGE FORMAT, I am not on DPUG as I am hoping Sean works out a system that works for us to talk about digital workflow to aid historical wet printing. I cannot handle any more websites to go to. As you can see by my posts I come here each day to see whats up here, as well I go to Large format each day.
Also when I approach my work and that of others I try not to be influenced by others work, for example I started Solarizations about 14 years ago and I deliberately tried to not look any more at Man Rays work, at least until I had done a few thousand print solarizations, then I felt I joined the club so to speak and started negative solarizations, which are very close to my heart.
With Lith Printing I was deeply influenced by Mike Spry and his way of making lith's for Anton Corjbin, but frankly none of my liths look like his, but for sure I am in the direction with a gritty non pretty colour look.
I am about to start solarizing large sheets of film that are digitally exposed through my Lambda, and during process turn on the lights. I think I will work with one of my good clients with this method where we make
size as film, solarize , and then make contact lith prints on various papers, therefore my interest in Bergger paper.
A second way would be to take the images and make them smaller lets say 8 x12 on the film , gang up a bunch, solarize the whole group and then high resolution scan the smaller film to make files that I can then resize and use as the base for tri tone and duo tone gum over palladiums.
So as you can see I have a lot on my plate and really two sites is enough distraction/satisfaction for me, and I hope to be setting trends and not following them. I am really not a pompous ass , but I have
problems with following other peoples work , as well in business I really do not follow what other printers are doing. I think this mindset keeps me fresh.
Yes, the technical data mentioned is often incomplete or dubious, unfortunately.
Stick with Moersh or LD20 IMO as I have tried Arista and its not even in the ball park speaking of those Jays .Well, you've also mastered many aspects of this stuff - the FB group is a great resource for people wanting to learn more, share tips and so on. I do appreciate the tips you've shared here - googling "MGWT" and "lith" delivers a lot of Mr. Carnie! (Speaking of, you've mentioned Moersch and one other dev for success with MGWT - I'm thinking it was LD20? Had very little luck with Arista and I'm loathe to burn through my Ektalure and Forte WT!!!)
As for the Jays - I'm guessing that's baseball? Did they just kick the Rangers' butts? Never been a sporty guy, though here in Texas, I'll turn football on because it make me say, "FINALLY, IT'S FALL, no more 106°!!!"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?