Cross process C-41 film stand developed in Rodinal (B&W chemistry)

OP
OP

StoneNYC

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
8,345
Location
Antarctica
Format
8x10 Format

Good job... yea, the extra exposure compensation is mainly because of the orange mask which messes up the exposure levels, its more than than anything, if there were no orange mask I think you wouldn't have to compensate...
 
OP
OP

StoneNYC

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
8,345
Location
Antarctica
Format
8x10 Format


As I mentioned... I think that's why you have to over expose 2 stops in order to compensate fore the orange mask.
 

case-ie

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2013
Messages
38
Format
Multi Format
OP
OP

StoneNYC

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
8,345
Location
Antarctica
Format
8x10 Format

Not bad at all, hmm maybe I'll try at one stop instead of two and see what happens, yes it's the vintage look that is the reason. I agree.

I really like the first one a lot.


~Stone

Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1, 5DmkII / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Messages
839
Location
mid-Missouri
Format
Pinhole

Love the tones and grain in the first one. I have some Agfa portrait 160 220 I think I'll try this way. One with coffee and one with Rodinal.
 

DesertGeoff

Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
2
Location
Corona, CA
Format
Medium Format
Hi everyone, I've read this thread before, but this is my first time actually trying it (a couple years later). I've been in nursing school the last couple years, but I just graduated and now I've got some free time to play with photography again.
Right now, I've got a Portra 160 color film shot @ 160 that's in the tank, stand developing for 3hours in 1:100 Rodinal 20C. If I understood the thread correctly, when stand developing color films in BW chemicals you should push the film 2 stops, (so instead of developing the box speed at 1hour, I will be developing for 3hours total) if it wasn't already shot 2 stops under before development.
I'll be back from the gym to agitate half way and will let you guys know if anything turns out.
Geoff.
 

LAG

Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
1,006
Location
The moon
Format
Multi Format

I am new to this forum, and I also arrive to late to this thread, but for what it is worth, when I cross C-41 films with B&W chemicals, there are three things (exp/dev/fix) that I do to get better negatives (look out! ... for me!!!):

Exp: I use the film 1 stop under box speed
Dev: between developer & fixer, I use one-shot povidona yodada (50% with water) - don't know those words in english -
Fixer: I double the estimated fixer time

In my opinion a stand (or semi) development will bring an excessive compensating effect, with very low contrast, though I must admit I've never did it.
 

DesertGeoff

Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
2
Location
Corona, CA
Format
Medium Format

Thank you for your help! Yes, this has been my experience too! My film came out very thin and washed out with low contrast, loss of shadow detail plus halo-effects, but the midtones were okay.
I will try your tips next time I plan to cross process.
I think not compensating for the EI by two stops under for the stand development is what ruined the film -because I have successfully cross processed Portra 160 before with the normal development process.
These are the scans alternating edited and the unedited -scanned in color:

Originally, I did 1:100 for 3 hours with 3x3 agitations, but next time I have film that's already shot at box speed, I will try a 1:50 solution for 1 hour with 1 or 2 agitations.
I think maybe increasing my developing dilution or decreasing my development time will help with the contrast and film density.
Side note: yes my developer is still new, I have only had it a couple months. I use it as a one shot (no reusing), and ive only done two or three rolls with the original bottle, so its still fresh.
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…