"Count Up" vs "Count Down" Frame Counters...What Is Your Preference?

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,542
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Since most cameras have frame counters that count up from 1, many might not know that there are also cameras that have frame counters that count down from the last frame on the roll.

In some ways the "Count Down" cameras are better. For example, one will know exactly when the last frame will be exposed without having to remember how many frames were loaded in the the cassette.

35mm cameras that "Count Down" also protect the exposed imaged within the cassette in case the back of the camera is unintentionally opened.

Anyone else have preferences one way or the other?



Some examples are Minolta 16mm cameras and Nikon N75 and N55.
 
OP
OP

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,542
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
In case one has never used it before, the Nikons mentioned above will wind all the film out of the cassette onto the takeup spool to determine how much film was in the cassette. Then It will expose the film backward starting at the cassette spool end, progessively winding the exposed frames into the cassette and counting down to one.
 

grain elevator

Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
1,286
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I like the idea of a camera that winds the exposed frames right into the casette where they are protected, but I don't have one. Which way the counter itself goes doesn't matter to me.
 

Chan Tran

Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
6,803
Location
Sachse, TX
Format
35mm
Winding the film backward as you advance the film doesn't make me feel comfortable because you are winding with the cassette spool not as good as the camera take up spool.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,671
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I like a count down, the Minolta 800si has a count down. With DX coded films tells me how many frames left regardless of 24 or 36 exposures, with non DX then it becomes a count up.
 

brbo

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
2,089
Location
EU
Format
Multi Format
Chan Tran said:
Winding the film backward as you advance the film doesn't make me feel comfortable because you are winding with the cassette spool not as good as the camera take up spool.
Click to expand...

How good the film advancement is (regular frame spacing) is not a function of a take-up spool. I have only one camera that counts down the frames and spacing is always perfect.

Paul Howell said:
I like a count down, the Minolta 800si has a count down. With DX coded films tells me how many frames left regardless of 24 or 36 exposures, with non DX then it becomes a count up.
Click to expand...

I hate it when a camera decides for me how many frames can be shot on a roll of film. In some cameras I can get as much as 41 frames (that's with loading the camera in daylight) from a 36exp rolls. Some film manufacturers are more stingy than others, so I might only get 39 from some rolls.
 
Last edited:

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,828
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I have both, and as long as I remember which approach the camera at hand uses I like them similarly.
My only niggling complaint about the ones that count down is that the frame numbers you end up on the negative go the wrong way!
 

Alan9940

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
2,421
Location
Arizona
Format
Multi Format
Since most of my 35mm camera are of the "count up" variety, it does jar my brain a bit when I use my Retina IIa which is a "count down" type. Also, the film winds on to the takeup spool like most 35mm cameras, even though it's a "count down" type, and you have to rewind back into the cassette when done.
 

foc

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
2,516
Location
Sligo, Ireland
Format
35mm
Chan Tran said:
Winding the film backward as you advance the film doesn't make me feel comfortable because you are winding with the cassette spool not as good as the camera take up spool.
Click to expand...

In most cameras, whether count up or down, it is the film perforations engaged in the film sprocket wheel that measure the amount of film advance.

My understanding is that rewind advance into the film cassette was designed to save the photos already taken if the camera door was opened mid roll. The rest of the roll was fogged but not the images in the cassette.
 
OP
OP

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,542
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
For the Nikon cameras mentioned, that wind up the exposed film to the cassette, the frame counting is via infra-red sensor on the sprocket hole; the cameras have no sprockets!
 

MultiFormat Shooter

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 24, 2016
Messages
567
Format
Multi Format
I definitely prefer "count up" cameras. Subjectively, they're what I am accustomed to. Objectively, they let you match the images, with the frame number on the film (i.e. frame number 1 is really the first image taken, not the 36th). Having the first frame taken numbered as 36 (or 24 or whatever), rather than 1 is a pain when cataloging film, at least to me.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,338
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I prefer count up counters, but I use which every the camera I am presently using have. While the Hasselblads count up, the NIkon AF cameras go one way or the other, each having made up its own mind without ever consulting me.
 

Patrick Robert James

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
3,346
Format
35mm RF
There is a case to be made for cameras that wind the film on, then back into the cassette as you shoot. With Canon cameras, the cheapo Rebel T2 does that. The 1n though will only wind up until 36 no matter how much film is left. The T2 on the other hand winds all the film out, so you know exactly how many frames are left. For bulk loaders that is a plus.
 

grahamp

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
1,706
Location
Vallejo (SF Bay Area)
Format
Multi Format
My old Voigtlander Vito B counts down - you have to set the starting value to match the film length. It also advances out of the cassette, and rewinds back (manually) after frame one is exposed. You can try and squeeze another frame or two, but the counter just sits on the dot at the end of the scale. I think that there may have been more variations in commercial film lengths back then (1950's), so knowing where the end is was more important.

At least you can hear the film come off the take-up spool and avoid having to fish for the leader

As long as I remember which camera I am using I don't care. They are slightly different as it is.
 

guangong

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
3,589
Format
Medium Format
I prefer count down. My count down cameras stop working after “1”, whereas with count up, I have the tendency to try and squeeze out additional shots after “36”. This creates a problem later filing negatives, and also running out of film when something interesting suddenly shows up.
 

abruzzi

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2018
Messages
3,055
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
Large Format
I only have one count down camera—Kodak Retina IIIC—and it doesn’t know how many frames are in the roll. Since these days everything I shoot on 35 is bulk rolled, it makes things challenging since I’m not very accurate rolling the cassettes so the remaining count is never accurate. .
 
OP
OP

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,542
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format

Tell me more. So it always starts on "36"?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,828
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

ic-racer said:
Tell me more. So it always starts on "36"?
Click to expand...

No - you have to manually set the frame counter when you start. So if you get it wrong - due to mistake or because the amount of film in the cassette is uncertain - then the camera will either not get down to frame "1" when you run out of room on the roll, or you will get to "1" when there is more than one frame still available.
Bulk film in a Retina means you need to load the film into the cassettes with "Retina-like" precision!
 
OP
OP

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,542
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format

Seems like a good way to do it. One would have the loaded cassette in-hand when stting the counter and presumable know how many frames. Otherwise, the cassette is locked in the camera, counting up until ... when?? How many frames did I load..??
 

Anon Ymous

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
3,661
Location
Greece
Format
35mm
I have both and don't care at all. The only minor peeve I have is with cameras which will not leave the leader out of the cassette when rewinding.
 

MFstooges

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
955
Format
35mm
I have a Nikon that sometimes counts and sometimes doesn't that I realize I don't really care. When it stops winding I reload.
Maybe I'll care if I do multiple exp or mid roll change but I don't do that these days.
 

alanrockwood

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2006
Messages
2,185
Format
Multi Format
I like the count down method. It is used on my Canon Rebel SLR cameras. This way I know how many shots are left on the roll.
 

mrosenlof

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
621
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
I like auto-reset frame counters, which by their nature must count up
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…