• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Could this kill film for good?

Lowlight freestyle

A
Lowlight freestyle

  • 0
  • 0
  • 24
man arguing 1972

A
man arguing 1972

  • 7
  • 0
  • 72

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
203,020
Messages
2,848,714
Members
101,602
Latest member
chasmccl
Recent bookmarks
0
Well, Mustafa, you surely like to see the bigger picture.
 
I think obama contucted the biggest crime on earth with closing free ebooks site , it looks like nazis burned the books.
He will pay this.

You seem to be well versed in many topics but Copyright (its benefits, and importance in the development of a society) might have escaped your radar.

Does citing the Nazis equals citing Hitler? (We are only at around post number 50. That's too early to mention Hitler :wink: ).
 
Glass cannot last that long. It is not that stable! Look it up!

PE

The stuff is made of quartz glass which is supposed to be much more stable and robust than ordinary glass.

I'm quite glad they found something like that. It might be an epochal progress, a bit like mobile-type printing, or network communication.

This is probably the demonstration of a broad technology, which can be, and will be, realized in various formats.

Just like magnetic tapes existed in many formats (reels, Super8, CompactCassettes, VHS, Betamax, DAT, and many other formats) I don't doubt that this basic technology will evolve, in time, in different formats (the Quartz-Glass CD or the Quartz-Glass DVD so to speak) but the information stored in a "disc" of each of those formats will be quite more durable than anything we know now barred bronze inscriptions.

The format variations are, for somebody conserving something, a minor problem if compared with the problem of the basic preservation of the material, just like for us photographers finding a projector to project let's say APS film (or 127, or 126, or 110 etc.) is a minor problem if compared with the preservation of the film itself.

Instead of inscribing the quartz by laser (a "serial" process and therefore slow) one day this quartz glass might be "printed" by chemical means maybe using some sort of film technology, like microprocessors - if I get it right - are produced today. So, in the end, the devil might be not so ugly as it is depicted.
 
By the way , if there would be a future for intelligent life for not more than 2000 years after , we will be at other galaxies , invent quantum teleportation and time travel.
No need for small glass pieces.
But if you can invent now a extremelly high quality translating software , allow to the book distribution free on e books without thinking to restrict the technology race , etc.

I think obama contucted the biggest crime on earth with closing free ebooks site , it looks like nazis burned the books.
He will pay this.

Umut

I disagree, his biggest crime is getting to the highest office in the land.

but apart from that I understand how you feel about ebooks, but while I don't agree with wholesale infringement upon intellectual property rights. having the dad blame gummiment step in is wrong. The letter of the law is that the copyright holder only has the right to pursue enforce of their rights in the country where it was assigend.It does not say that you have to pursue copyright violations,it is up to the copyright holder to pursue infringment.
With the goverment stepping in it exceeded its authority. but thats nothing new to the man from illinois administration.
 
The comment of Obama killing ebooks sounds more like political rumor, the greatest defender of copyright in this country is the Disney company, they probably have the most to lose also. The office of President proposes but makes no laws and judges no offenders, that is up to congress and the judiciary. The three branches of government. The office of president gives a thumbs up or down, and that can be overturned by congress (I'm using congress here generally to refer to both houses).

As to print through, it all depends on storage techniques and original recording practice. It is definately easier to deal with than corrupted digital files.
 
...I think obama contucted the biggest crime on earth with closing free ebooks site , it looks like nazis burned the books.
He will pay this.

Umut

Is that a not so veiled threat from a foriegn national againt the president of the US? You've way over stepped the bounds of dececy!
 
I disagree, his biggest crime is getting to the highest office in the land.

Whilst I don't agree with you (and it doesn't matter because I'm not American) if this was a crime, it was committed collectively by all American voters.

See what happens next time... I suspect there will be no change.


Steve.
 
You seem to be well versed in many topics but Copyright (its benefits, and importance in the development of a society) might have escaped your radar.

Does citing the Nazis equals citing Hitler? (We are only at around post number 50. That's too early to mention Hitler :wink: ).

No it isn't.


HITLER

There.:smile:
 
At the risk of returning this thread to its topic ....

This product could affect the market for film intended to be used to archive images and data.
 
At the risk of returning this thread to its topic ....

This product could affect the market for film intended to be used to archive images and data.

You are correct I'm not getting into a political discussion with libtards.

What ever the medium, images need to saved for future reference.
 
You are correct I'm not getting into a political discussion with libtards.

What ever the medium, images need to saved for future reference.

Take the name calling and political discussion to the soapbox. No further comment needed on this from anyone. Thanks.
 
At the risk of returning this thread to its topic ....

This product could affect the market for film intended to be used to archive images and data.

Certainly so, but film intended to be used to archive images and data is overall, I imagine, a small part of the film production so in itself this new technology would not kill film for good, although it might kill that particular kind of film one day.
 
I don't believe it will kill film. People shoot the medium for a lot of different reasons besides having images around for a million years. I imagine very few people shoot digital thinking that way either.

I also think the work of famous photographers, like Bresson and Adams, will be around as long as they have significance.

Just my 2 cents,
 
TBH the best way to keep film alive is to:

Keep buying it

Get others interested

If you have children/nephews/nieces/young cousins then at least show them film and explain how it works. Don't be pushy - that'll kill their interest in seconds. Just try to provoke their natural curiosity and see where it takes them. Shoot a roll of film at a family gathering and then either let them get involved with processing it or just take the negatives with you next time you meet.
 
Here is a link to a new development from Hitachi, the Japanese electronics company. They have developed a glass memory device that is suppose to last a million years. No film can do that nor can any CD. Read about it here...

Dead Link Removed

Enjoy, Ric.

I've thought Platinum/Palladium rock prints would be interesting. Kind of an upgrade.
 
I threw away my VHS tapes and VCR a couple of weeks ago. Reminds me, I still have some floppy disks and DAT tapes that I also should throw away, as I no longer have any means to read them.

As all others before it , this storage invention will be outdated long before its media become unreadable.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom