Continuos agitating process - lack of acutance.

The Padstow Busker

A
The Padstow Busker

  • 0
  • 0
  • 20
End Table

A
End Table

  • 1
  • 1
  • 102
Cafe Art

A
Cafe Art

  • 8
  • 6
  • 216
Sciuridae

A
Sciuridae

  • 6
  • 3
  • 201

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,665
Messages
2,762,692
Members
99,436
Latest member
AtlantaArtist
Recent bookmarks
0

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,050
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
In my experience, there is very little difference between the acutance (edge contrast) achievable from standard intermittent agitation and continuous agitation. If you want to increase "sharpness" - you can add that by introducing edge effects using reduced agitation techniques like semi-stand.
But "sharpness" and accutance aren't the same - inter-related, and accutance is a major contributor to sharpness, but they are not the same.
 

agentlossing

Member
Joined
May 11, 2023
Messages
47
Location
Seattle
Format
35mm
Intermittent agitation -normal agitation- works well for me so far.

I don't shot too many rolls so Lab-box is till now really convenient and I'm happy with it. The key is how many rolls do you process simultaneously; if there is only one is convenient, but if you have many more maybe the use of a traditional -Paterson- tank is more advisable.

From the mechanic point of view, Lab-box worked fine for me from the very beginning.

I only regretted getting rid of my Paterson tank when processing C41 film, since a) it's nice to develop two rolls at once with chemicals brought up to correct temperature, and b) submerging the tank in water of the correct temperature is a good way to keep the chemical temps from drifting. So, if you shoot color, maybe keep that in mind (Paterson tanks are cheap enough that there's good cause to have both, honestly).
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,180
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I only regretted getting rid of my Paterson tank when processing C41 film, since a) it's nice to develop two rolls at once with chemicals brought up to correct temperature, and b) submerging the tank in water of the correct temperature is a good way to keep the chemical temps from drifting. So, if you shoot color, maybe keep that in mind (Paterson tanks are cheap enough that there's good cause to have both, honestly).

Welcome to APUG Photrio!!
 
OP
OP
Rumbo181

Rumbo181

Member
Joined
May 25, 2023
Messages
21
Location
Madrid - Spain
Format
35mm
I only regretted getting rid of my Paterson tank when processing C41 film, since a) it's nice to develop two rolls at once with chemicals brought up to correct temperature, and b) submerging the tank in water of the correct temperature is a good way to keep the chemical temps from drifting. So, if you shoot color, maybe keep that in mind (Paterson tanks are cheap enough that there's good cause to have both, honestly).

It sounds sensible, thank you for your advice.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,655
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Rumbo181, you may want to look at this recent video on Rodinal and its various dilutions. It appears that I am not very good at seeing some aspects of photographs that others see much more easily but I feel I can see a difference. It isn't a massive difference at 1+100 but when he places the prints of 1+25 and 1+100 directly in front of the camera I can see it

Anyway here is it for what it is worth:



pentaxuser
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom