Contax T opinions

Jared and Rick at Moot

A
Jared and Rick at Moot

  • 1
  • 0
  • 372
Leaf in Creek

Leaf in Creek

  • 1
  • 0
  • 376
Leaf in Creek

A
Leaf in Creek

  • 6
  • 0
  • 792
Untitled

Untitled

  • 2
  • 2
  • 901

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,948
Messages
2,799,317
Members
100,084
Latest member
Marshal!
Recent bookmarks
0

puketronic

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2011
Messages
199
Format
35mm
I bought a Contax T from keh.com. I'm pretty excited to try it out.

This camera doesn't seem too popular. Why?

More specifically.

What is the viewfinder magnification?

Is the lens good for flare?
 

summicron1

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
2,920
Location
Ogden, Utah
Format
Multi Format
most folks ask those sort of questions before buying, you can find all the answers you need at this review, but I suspect, from this, that it will be just lovely to use.

http://www.kenrockwell.com/contax/t.htm

i suspect it is not too popular because it is expensive and, from a user viewpoint, a bit limited. Many alternatives -- Olympus XA or Rollei 35 -- can both be had for a lot less.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

chip j

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Messages
2,193
Location
NE Ohio
Format
35mm
My Leica dealer showed me prints from a Contax T & from a Leica mini of the same vintage. He said the leica optics were superior, but I thought the Contax had more "sparkle".
 

Oren Grad

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2005
Messages
1,619
Format
Large Format
...from a user viewpoint, a bit limited, with no rangefinder.

It does have a rangefinder. It's just not terribly common, has tended to be quite expensive compared to other compacts, and offers aperture priority AE only - no manual control of shutter speeds.
 
OP
OP

puketronic

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2011
Messages
199
Format
35mm
I read about the camera and it sounded pretty good, so I bought one off of keh.com to try out. I figured that I can return it if I didn't like it. I don't expect the lens to flare and I don't mind the viewfinder magnification either. I am just curious. I received the camera last night but I haven't had a chance to fool around with it. My initial impression is that it is solid and compact. The viewfinder/rangefinder is very useable. The controls are a little fiddly but not that bad, for camera this compact.

I'm surprised that this camera isn't too popular. Most people seem to go with the T2 in the Contax compact P&S line. It's true that the XA can be had for less, but people buy T2s even though the Epic can be had for less. I don't consider the Rollei 35 to be an alternative (although the Rollei 35 is a very good camera, I have one) but I do recognize the XA as one. It doesn't really matter, because if I like it, I like it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Trask

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Messages
1,935
Location
Virginia (northern)
Format
35mm RF
I've got a T, and think it's a fine camera. Much more solid than an Olympus XA, which also (in my copy) seemed to have significant corner fall-off. I don't know why someone would prefer an autofocus. I soured on autofocus after missing a number of photos during a trip to the country of Georgia (to which I knew I was unlikely to return) because the autofocus just wasn't able to achieve proper focus. At least with a manual focus camera the user can always focus when and where he/she wants.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom