Contax AX v Leica R8

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,044
Messages
2,768,779
Members
99,542
Latest member
berznarf
Recent bookmarks
0

Havoc

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2011
Messages
23
Location
North Yorksh
Format
Medium Format
I'm looking to buy a 35mm camera and have looked at the Contax AX and LeicaR8 as possible options, which one would you recommend and why ? Thanks in advance for any feedback or advice, much appreciated.

John.
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
I'd recommend a Contax RX instead of the AX, but otherwise I'm with Andrew. Lenses are at least the equal of Leica glass, at a fraction of the price. They're also lighter in weight (the Leica lens bodies are I think still substantially brass, as opposed to aluminium in the Contax lenses). But I could be wrong about that - it may only be the older R-series lenses that had brass barrels. I had an extensive Contax setup at one time, with an RX and two 167MT bodies, the 35 f2.8, 50 f1.7, 85 f1.4, 35-70 f3.5, 80-200 f4, and a Sigma 18-35 zoom. I took many wonderful images with that outfit, but the bulk of shooting SLRs when travelling got to me and I switched... to a Contax G2 outfit.
 

Rol_Lei Nut

Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
1,108
Location
Hamburg
Format
Multi Format
The R8 might ultimately be more reliable (though it had early electronic problems - probably/hopefully taken care of on any working ones today).

About Zeiss vs. Leica lenses, you really can't go wrong with either.
They sometimes/often have different signatures which are largely a matter of personal taste. Grossly generalising, later Leica lenses might be "technically" better while Zeiss often has a "look" I like better.
Used R lenses aren't as exaggeratedly expensive as legend has it (at least in Europe) if you shop and choose carefully.

Leica lenses *are* heavy (even the later ones), so if that's an issue, go for Zeiss.
I use both... :smile: Zeiss belongs to my SLR travel kit (Rolleiflex SLR), while Leica R is my main "home" SLR kit.
 

flatulent1

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
1,505
Location
Seattle USA
Format
Multi Format
Last time I looked in the KEH catalog, R lenses were no more expensive than C/Y lenses, though there were far fewer R lenses available. And while I would dearly love an R8, I have an AX, RX, and RTS III that I'm quite satisfied with. I consider the RX to be one of the finest 35mm SLR ever made, though I use the T90 far more often.
 

Karl K

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
1,101
Location
NJ
Format
35mm
Having just received an AX in a trade, I must say that I'm impressed with its fit and finish as well as its ease of use.
The extra 10mm of focus extension is great for macro work and the autofocus is a welcomed bonus that Leica can't match. Granted, the AX's autofocus works best in bright light, but manual fine-focusing is very convenient under tough conditions. This is being written many months after the OP's query, but I just felt like adding my two cents.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom